James Cridland

James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

Twitter as a website traffic generator

Posted on Saturday, June 13th, 2009 at 9:09pm. #

Quite a while back, I wrote a few Twitterbots to post Media UK’s jobs and news to Twitter. The site already has daily email alerts, but adding Twitter support was quick and fairly simple to do. I even wrote some code to shorten links with bit.ly as part of the work. The result can be seen at @mediaukjobs, and the three news services @mediaukradio, @mediauktv and @mediaukpress. (You can pause at this point to follow some or all of those accounts.)

More recently, I added Google Analytics tracking codes to the URLs: because I was curious how many people are using these alerts, and whether it’s getting me any more traffic. Media UK also sends out email alert newsletters, so I added tracking to these email alerts, and also did the same to the iGoogle widgets I’ve been promoting for many years.

First – iGoogle. Don’t bother with it for traffic. It’s not a realistic traffic generator. Media UK’s news widget gets negligible use: its installation base is high, but it gets fewer clickthroughs per day than I have fingers. It’s probably a good brand reinforcer, but for traffic? No.

So, what about Twitter and Email?

The obvious-if-you-think-about-it news is that Twitter is significantly better at getting you brand new visits – 43% of traffic to Media UK from its Twitterbots was what Google Analytics call “new visits”, compared to just over 10% for email.

Obvious, of course – you have to come to Media UK to sign up for the free emails, whereas it’s possible to find the Twitterbots using other means – but I certainly wasn’t expecting it to be four times as good at getting brand new traffic.

And the other, obvious-if-you-think-about-it, thing: Twitter delivers more visits per person – 1.18 per ‘follower’, rather than 0.72 per email subscriber.

So – adding separate Twitter alert accounts is fairly quick and simple to do; and have can have a surprising effect on traffic if you promote them well.

The full figures are here:

Twitter
5,053 followers*
6,009 visits (1.18 per follower)
2.7 pages/visit
43% new visits

Email
13,288 subscribers*
9,602 visits (0.72 per follower)
3.21 pages/visit
11.4% new visits

* Because Media UK runs more than one email newsletter and twitter feed, these figures will be an over-estimate.

Screengrabbed by Beth Kanter. Her screengrab used under licence.

3 Other Comments

6 comments

Fluffy Links – Monday June 15th 2009 « Damien Mulley said at June 15th, 2009 at 4:38am

[...] O’Croídlánd points out the traffic Twitter sends to one of his [...]

Dave said at June 15th, 2009 at 9:23am

Just to let you know, you’re missing the “h” in http: on the first link, so the link won’t work.

Dave

This comment was originally posted on Damien Mulley

Damien Mulley said at June 15th, 2009 at 9:50am

Cheers!

This comment was originally posted on Damien Mulley

Joe Scanlon said at June 15th, 2009 at 10:22am

The Adam Boulton clip really helps with the monday morning blues. LOL

This comment was originally posted on Damien Mulley

lisadom said at June 15th, 2009 at 9:03pm

Hey, that is just what I have noticed recently. Much better than any other way of directing traffic.

xx

Another Social Media Slideshare Deck « A Fuller View said at June 25th, 2009 at 8:30pm

[...] going on around how we converse, tweet and retweet as well – and somre more here and here. This all adds to our conviction that we still have a lot to learn about how socia media works and [...]

Leave a comment

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.

This website uses Gravatars (the pretty pictures of commenters). Upload yours here.

Additional comments powered by BackType