<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The worst UK media sites for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/</link>
	<description>From a radio futurologist - where broadcast radio and new platforms collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-04-15 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-32733</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-04-15 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32733</guid>
		<description>[...] The worst UK media sites for SEO - James Cridland &#8220;Given that most traffic comes from search engines, this roughly equates to the websites where Media UK outperforms a media owner’s own website - by coming high, if not #1, for the media owner’s keywords on Google.&#8221; (tags: internet newspapersites search marketing seo) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The worst UK media sites for SEO &#8211; James Cridland &#8220;Given that most traffic comes from search engines, this roughly equates to the websites where Media UK outperforms a media owner’s own website &#8211; by coming high, if not #1, for the media owner’s keywords on Google.&#8221; (tags: internet newspapersites search marketing seo) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-32707</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32707</guid>
		<description>haha! The Derby Evening Telegraph... that doesn&#039;t surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha! The Derby Evening Telegraph&#8230; that doesn&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almost witty</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-32703</link>
		<dc:creator>almost witty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32703</guid>
		<description>Way back during the first dotcom boom, I think mainstream opinion was that optimizing for search engines was a nice thing, but to get your website visitors, you were supposed to splatter your URL everywhere, in your marketing and advertising.

Looks like some organisations still haven&#039;t learnt that things move on, and Google is now the gatekeeper to the Net for a lot of people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back during the first dotcom boom, I think mainstream opinion was that optimizing for search engines was a nice thing, but to get your website visitors, you were supposed to splatter your URL everywhere, in your marketing and advertising.</p>
<p>Looks like some organisations still haven&#8217;t learnt that things move on, and Google is now the gatekeeper to the Net for a lot of people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-32699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32699</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and your comment about Talk Sport putting UK in the tittle is something I have said for a long time, so many seem to forget a simple fact, which is if people are looking for UK sites they put UK in the search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and your comment about Talk Sport putting UK in the tittle is something I have said for a long time, so many seem to forget a simple fact, which is if people are looking for UK sites they put UK in the search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

