<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best email bounce ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-best-email-bounce-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-best-email-bounce-ever/</link>
	<description>From a radio futurologist - where broadcast radio and new platforms collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio at the Edge - live blog - blog - James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-best-email-bounce-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-34543</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio at the Edge - live blog - blog - James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=855#comment-34543</guid>
		<description>[...] talks about how they handle email bounces. Doesn&#8217;t know how long it&#8217;ll take for this to work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talks about how they handle email bounces. Doesn&#8217;t know how long it&#8217;ll take for this to work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Evans</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/the-best-email-bounce-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-34521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=855#comment-34521</guid>
		<description>And on the downside... it probably causes spam to back-scatter to innocent bystanders.  (Unless the receiving MX is very careful to only send such auto-replies when it&#039;s really sure that the email isn&#039;t spam, that is).

Readable (by mere mortals) MTA errors are often incompatible with anti-spam best practice.  Sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the downside&#8230; it probably causes spam to back-scatter to innocent bystanders.  (Unless the receiving MX is very careful to only send such auto-replies when it&#8217;s really sure that the email isn&#8217;t spam, that is).</p>
<p>Readable (by mere mortals) MTA errors are often incompatible with anti-spam best practice.  Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

