James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

|

A trawl around the web, March 21st to March 24th

Monday, March 24th, 2008


Photo: snow in Sheringham, taken March 23rd by Adam Bowie. Used under licence

Socialthing! on the iPhone
How splendid. Hope I get more invites soon; it’s a really nice app.

New Virgin Radio homepage coming soon
Hidden in this blog posting, news that a new (and naturally 'beta') homepage comes this week from my old friends at Virgin. Looking forward to seeing it.

The LSE's Freetard fiasco - when creator-haters flock together
Of course, this is in The Register, and therefore is probably bollocks. But a great writeup of a typical music copyright meeting. [via John Naughton].

User experience at Google
Suppose I'd better watch this…

Stalkerfeed
My 'stalkerfeed', now I guess known as a friendfeed. Oh well, I missed another web meme. Anyway, this now contains output from 'wordie', my new favourite website.

Wordie
What a splendiferous site. "Like Flickr, but without the photos", it calls itself. Which is about right. There's nothing crapulent about this site; indeed, it’s quite cremulent. I've created two lists, linked from my homepage.

This is a tidied and edited list of my del.icio.us postings from March 21st to March 24th. You can subscribe to this list, live, via rss.

A trawl around the web, January 26th to February 14th

Thursday, February 14th, 2008


Uploaded on 13 February 2008, this is a viewing platform in the war museum in Salford Quays. Photo by Mike Willshaw. Used under licence.

All this online sharing has to stop
It's ruining the motor mechanic industry. (No, really)

Flickr CC search
A quick page whipped up to help me find nice pictures for this blog - it searches all Flickr CC images together (which the Flickr UI won’t let me do).

Aussies Head to SXSW
A website using one of my photos, albeit only credited in the ALT tag (which isn’t cricket, by the way).

Oceanworld Manly
Another spotting of one of my photographs, complete with a link to my own website. How splendid.

Living on Earth: Swedish Body Heat
Sounds exciting, but actually it’s a radio feature about trains, aired on WBUR and other stations. They used one of my photographs to illustrate it on the web. Cool.

When statistics speak volumes
Good piece by Paul Smith on the press releases radio stations send out on figures day. Paul still owes me a fiver, by the way.

MMS For O2 iPhone
Just the thing I was looking for. Brilliant - now I can receive MMS on the iPhone. (Bizarre that it doesn’t support it…)

Twitter on the iPhone: Hahlo
While I’m on an iPhone theme, I use this for Twitter (it’s much prettier than it looks on this page). For this, and for the MMS thing, I’ve donated.

Keeping the conversation going
Nic Price activates a magic Wordpress plugin. So have I. Good idea.

Do We Have The Backup?
‘how it can be legitimate for a government to build roads but not to lay fibre is a mystery to me, and one that deserves to be questioned.’ Good point.

Big name #4
Hello, ladies. Contacting me has never been easier. Etc.

What HD-2s Don’t Stream And Should?
A rant about streaming. But included in this is interesting: WRXK’s HD2 channel (a new one only for HD radios) is entirely themed around their breakfast presenter. Neat idea. (Course, I was behind the ‘Virgin Radio Party Classics’ channel on Sky, voiced by Suggs.)

Interactivity: A lost opportunity for your station?
Some “isn’t the US behind the rest of us” type thoughts from Mark Ramsey; but some useful and interesting figures he quotes.

This is a tidied and edited list of my del.icio.us postings from January 26th to February 14th. You can subscribe to this list, live, via rss.

Screw it, let’s do it

Friday, June 1st, 2007

A 'dingdong' tailored for your tastes

Martin Stiksel is a quiet man. He’s balding, dresses in the understated and almost scruffy casual wear of young London companies. He speaks quietly with an Austrian accent, and smiles a lot. He’s a very nice chap.

I had a public argument with him once. But he warmly greets me whenever I see him: whether at his offices in trendy North London, or at conferences. Softly chiding me for using his services in ways he didn’t forsee and doesn’t altogether approve of; asking for, and sharing, information about our businesses; thoughtfully thinking about my answers.

As of this week, Martin is also a multi-millionaire: £19m came his way this week in a new personal fortune, courtesy of US broadcaster CBS, when they bought the company he founded with Felix Miller and Richard Jones. That company, launched in 2002 and now with fifteen million users, is the music website last.fm.

Of everything that’s been written about last.fm’s sale, one point has been missed, apparently: the not insubstantial point that the company has made it’s fortune by not playing by the rules.

Commercial radio doesn’t have “listen again”, the main point of the impressive BBC Radio Player. If you’re a fan of The Geoff Show, you can only listen to the podcast, and not the entire show, music and all. And, that’s been the case with virtually every single commercial radio station. There’s no licence arranged with the RadioCentre, unlike with podcasting, so therefore it’s difficult and arguably even impossible for each radio company to pursue a separate deal. And, because there is no deal, there’s no way to “listen again” to the wealth and breadth of commercial radio output - leaving that to the BBC to exploit. This isn’t through lack of trying, I should add.

What’s possibly rather surprising is that last.fm also has no such deal. Sure, they recently - very recently - signed a few deals with Warner and EMI, but most of what you hear on last.fm’s jukebox music services is not apparently licenced. Again, last.fm has been trying to get a blanket deal for a long while, but not managed to get the likes of PPL to agree. They’ve built their business on telling the record companies to go away and come back with a deal that makes sense; and producing their service anyway. A business that, this week, was worth £142m.

So: commercial radio couldn’t get a licence, so didn’t launch new services.
last.fm couldn’t get a licence, but launched anyway, and built a great business.

It’s slightly irritating if you follow the rules and pay many millions of pounds to record companies, that the record companies appear not to take action against services like last.fm - and allow them to produce a great business while ignoring the rules. Copyright payments aren’t on the basis of an honesty tax; and concerning that the record companies see them that way. There’s no legal argument for witholding payment; there’s certainly a moral one.

I note that one station has quietly launched ‘listen-again’ services within their radio player, despite the lack of a RadioCentre-brokered deal. Could be that someone else is thinking the last.fm way too. Wonder what the record companies will do?

At the beginning of this, I mentioned I’d had a public argument with my newly-minted acquaintance. I asked him, in a Guardian conference in 2005 (three years after he launched), what music deals he’d signed. He replied to say he had not signed any deal with the record companies. I asked him whether that made him a glorified pirate radio station. Probably not the fairest of questions - but perhaps quite truthful. He quietly shrugged.

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 … C0ugh

Sunday, May 6th, 2007

Another on-the-button column by John Naughton this morning, describing the magical list of hex that renders a BluRay DVD copyable by all, and what happened when Digg tried to stop its users from posting it. The Observer coyly only prints 09F9 - but a Google Search for that reveals the lot, including the rather splendid 09f9.com - in over 2.6 million web pages. (The US’s DMCA appears to make this number illegal to post, since it could be used to illegally gain access to copyrighted material).

My own internal jury’s still out on DRM. One part of me hates it - if I buy music, then that’s mine to use personally however I wish. One part of me accepts it as a sad reality of life online today, given the undoubtedly large amount of Napster/BitTorrent-esque stealing/sharing that goes on from morally bankrupt users. One part of me defends DRM as “if companies want to do silly things like that, fine, but respect their decision and don’t steal/share their work without their permission”. One part of me might use ‘illegal’ services to get albums that the record companies have withdrawn from their catalogue, thus leaving me no other way to get the music I would have legally bought had the record company not made this impossible.

But, no matter. I’ve edited some of the hex codes out in my header, even though I’m not even sure whether the part of the DMCA that stops US citizens posting this seemingly innocuous code applies to us in the European Union [yet]. I don’t fully appreciate whether I am now liable (by UK law) since I’ve linked to the full code on this web page (but if so, Google’s clearly 2.5 million times more liable than I am). This shows legal absurdity on a massive scale, and a really obvious and clear demonstration of how many legal people Just Don’t Get It.

—update— There’s a good legal viewpoint on EFF’s website, for US law. An equivalent for UK law would be good.

—update2— The clever Wil Harris has posted a good background primer on what 09-f9 is - and apparently, it’s now useless anyway…

.

On the legal-purchase point, I was wondering last week about something, so, given it’s related, perhaps someone might be able to help me with the below:

I want to buy a (quite old) CD album.
- I can buy it new from Amazon, for £12. Some of this money therefore goes back to the record company.
- I can buy it used from Amazon/eBay, for £3. None of this money goes to the record company. £3 goes to the person who currently owns the CD.
- I can download it for free using BitTorrent. No money changes hands.

Presumably, #2 is legal, otherwise Amazon/eBay wouldn’t be able to do it. But how does the difference between #2 and #3 square with the “giving money to the artist” argument that the record companies talk about? In #2, since a third party is benefiting in financial terms from re-selling this CD, am I actually doing better if I download it instead?

My own past experience is that I downloaded an album from the Eels via Napster years ago, listened to it, and liked it. I’ve now bought at least three Eels albums, other Eels downloads, and went to see an Eels concert last year (rather misguidedly, it ought to be said, it was a bit miserable). Have the Eels benefitted from that initial illegal download? I’d think so.