<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radio 3.0 part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/radio-30-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/radio-30-part-1/</link>
	<description>Radio futurologist and beer drinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcasting&#8217;s effect on the radio - blog - James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/radio-30-part-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcasting&#8217;s effect on the radio - blog - James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/05/17/radio-30-part-1/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>[...] on-demand listening via the BBC iPlayer, the audience for the programme had actually increased. (I blogged about this speech, delivered by Jenny Abramsky, at the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on-demand listening via the BBC iPlayer, the audience for the programme had actually increased. (I blogged about this speech, delivered by Jenny Abramsky, at the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/radio-30-part-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/05/17/radio-30-part-1/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>As an aside, checking this:

- Finally points out that live listening is not dead: 15m live listening hours last month for the BBC online (pretty damn good!) compares to 474m live listening hours across all platforms.

...I discover the comparison was flawed - between monthly online figures, but weekly RAJAR figures. The actual figures, for your delectation (and my use tomorrow in a dull panel) are...

- 15m live listening hours last month for the BBC online (pretty damn good!) compares to &lt;B&gt;1.9 billion&lt;/b&gt; live listening hours across all platforms. [Source: RAJAR weekly, quardupled, for BBC network radio only]

This is actually quite a low figure for live listening on the internet, being less than 1% of total, which I find surprising; Virgin&#039;s hovers around 5-6% of total reach, and our online users listen to us, by and large, for longer than a standard RAJAR diarist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, checking this:</p>
<p>- Finally points out that live listening is not dead: 15m live listening hours last month for the BBC online (pretty damn good!) compares to 474m live listening hours across all platforms.</p>
<p>&#8230;I discover the comparison was flawed &#8211; between monthly online figures, but weekly RAJAR figures. The actual figures, for your delectation (and my use tomorrow in a dull panel) are&#8230;</p>
<p>- 15m live listening hours last month for the BBC online (pretty damn good!) compares to <b>1.9 billion</b> live listening hours across all platforms. [Source: RAJAR weekly, quardupled, for BBC network radio only]</p>
<p>This is actually quite a low figure for live listening on the internet, being less than 1% of total, which I find surprising; Virgin&#8217;s hovers around 5-6% of total reach, and our online users listen to us, by and large, for longer than a standard RAJAR diarist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William T</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/radio-30-part-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>William T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/05/17/radio-30-part-1/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>This is the DAB/FM thing no-one (well not me anyone) thought would ever happen?

My feeling is that its got to be 50 pounds or less to consider buying, and I do wonder how much drain it&#039;ll put on the already short Ipod battery life (in addition to the rather ugly bolt on nature of all Ipod attachments).

I wonder who they are partnering with to make it, and whether you&#039;ll be able to record live radio...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the DAB/FM thing no-one (well not me anyone) thought would ever happen?</p>
<p>My feeling is that its got to be 50 pounds or less to consider buying, and I do wonder how much drain it&#8217;ll put on the already short Ipod battery life (in addition to the rather ugly bolt on nature of all Ipod attachments).</p>
<p>I wonder who they are partnering with to make it, and whether you&#8217;ll be able to record live radio&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

