<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More internet radio figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/more-internet-radio-figures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/more-internet-radio-figures/</link>
	<description>From a radio futurologist - where broadcast radio and new platforms collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briantist</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/more-internet-radio-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-36959</link>
		<dc:creator>Briantist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=1693#comment-36959</guid>
		<description>It does seem quite reasonable that it would be option (1) as the BBC Radio stations are most easily accessed for most people via a broadcast radio because the technology had been around for so long.

I&#039;m not quite sure why we can&#039;t have industry-wide precise and accurate live metrics for online radio listening, it would be quite feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem quite reasonable that it would be option (1) as the BBC Radio stations are most easily accessed for most people via a broadcast radio because the technology had been around for so long.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure why we can&#8217;t have industry-wide precise and accurate live metrics for online radio listening, it would be quite feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/more-internet-radio-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-36835</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=1693#comment-36835</guid>
		<description>Also, don&#039;t forget that RAJAR is sampling the number of people listening whereas the BBC figures are for the number of streams.  If two people are listening to the same online stream for an hour then RAJAR will count that as two hours and the BBC will count that as one.

I would imagine that most online listening is 1 listener:1 stream with people sat in front of their computers but as internet radios are becoming more prevalent it would seem viable that several people could be listening to one radio set in the corner of the room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, don&#8217;t forget that RAJAR is sampling the number of people listening whereas the BBC figures are for the number of streams.  If two people are listening to the same online stream for an hour then RAJAR will count that as two hours and the BBC will count that as one.</p>
<p>I would imagine that most online listening is 1 listener:1 stream with people sat in front of their computers but as internet radios are becoming more prevalent it would seem viable that several people could be listening to one radio set in the corner of the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/more-internet-radio-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-36831</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=1693#comment-36831</guid>
		<description>I also realise that the online figures are global in nature, not restricted to the UK. Since the 2.2% figure relates to the UK only, that would assume that the reported internet radio figures now appear even lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also realise that the online figures are global in nature, not restricted to the UK. Since the 2.2% figure relates to the UK only, that would assume that the reported internet radio figures now appear even lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

