<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is DMB a totally different technology to DAB?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/</link>
	<description>From a radio futurologist - where broadcast radio and new platforms collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/comment-page-1/#comment-26688</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/12/05/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/#comment-26688</guid>
		<description>(A fair key point, MM. But the post is actually saying that the networks cannot be upgraded, and doesn&#039;t talk about filling multiplexes totally and swapping like with like.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(A fair key point, MM. But the post is actually saying that the networks cannot be upgraded, and doesn&#8217;t talk about filling multiplexes totally and swapping like with like.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/comment-page-1/#comment-26566</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/12/05/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/#comment-26566</guid>
		<description>The key point is that T-DMB is less spectrum efficient than DAB+ . In addition, French radios will need a lot of bits to provide the kind of interactive and video services they are planning. For the sake of argument, if a multiplex is providing 50 DAB+ services, it will not be possible to migrate to 50 DMB services. 

Incidentally, more details about France&#039;s digital strategy are available at http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/conferen/albanel/radionum.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key point is that T-DMB is less spectrum efficient than DAB+ . In addition, French radios will need a lot of bits to provide the kind of interactive and video services they are planning. For the sake of argument, if a multiplex is providing 50 DAB+ services, it will not be possible to migrate to 50 DMB services. </p>
<p>Incidentally, more details about France&#8217;s digital strategy are available at <a href="http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/conferen/albanel/radionum.htm">http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/conferen/albanel/radionum.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/comment-page-1/#comment-26288</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/12/05/is-dmb-a-totally-different-technology-to-dab/#comment-26288</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the &quot;cultural&quot; difference in France actually the one that Mike Mullane mentions in his blog - French broadcasters don&#039;t want to provide more choice to listeners.  UK (commercial) broadcasters were very interested in a DAB system because in the DAB world they can increase their market share against the BBC.  French broadcasters are happy with the status quo, plus tyhe ability to offer data services on top.  (Plus, they are French, and going it alone and not giving in to the Anglo-Saxons is in their blood...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the &#8220;cultural&#8221; difference in France actually the one that Mike Mullane mentions in his blog &#8211; French broadcasters don&#8217;t want to provide more choice to listeners.  UK (commercial) broadcasters were very interested in a DAB system because in the DAB world they can increase their market share against the BBC.  French broadcasters are happy with the status quo, plus tyhe ability to offer data services on top.  (Plus, they are French, and going it alone and not giving in to the Anglo-Saxons is in their blood&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

