<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye Pennine FM (again) (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/goodbye-pennine-fm-again-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/goodbye-pennine-fm-again-again/</link>
	<description>Radio futurologist and beer drinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/goodbye-pennine-fm-again-again/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=2135#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Oddly, I&#039;d rather like to run it. I&#039;d rebroadcast Nick Ferrari&#039;s breakfast show from LBC, and podcasts from around the world during the rest of the day. I&#039;d make no pretence of being local. It would offer a real choice for speech radio fans in the area. It would be very cheap to run, requiring no studios, and I could run it from my house in North London: the only cost would be the cost of the transmitter. Better to offer some extra choice, Ofcom, or none at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly, I&#8217;d rather like to run it. I&#8217;d rebroadcast Nick Ferrari&#8217;s breakfast show from LBC, and podcasts from around the world during the rest of the day. I&#8217;d make no pretence of being local. It would offer a real choice for speech radio fans in the area. It would be very cheap to run, requiring no studios, and I could run it from my house in North London: the only cost would be the cost of the transmitter. Better to offer some extra choice, Ofcom, or none at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Easton</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/goodbye-pennine-fm-again-again/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=2135#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>&quot;My understanding is that the licence is being given back to Ofcom. I wonder if they let anyone have another go?&quot;

To date none of the other licence &#039;hand-backs&#039; have been re-advertised - with the exception of Diamond FM in Plymouth, who won a licence but never launched.

Those licences now coming up for re-advertisement that don&#039;t qualify for automatic renewal because of qualifying DAB carriage, are currently only being re-awarded until 31/12/2015 - which is also the cut-off for all other licences. Such a short-term period is unlikely to prove attractive to potential new applicants who would have to launch a station from scratch.

Presumably Pennine FM had sought a potential buyer but none was forthcoming.

It&#039;s a sad day for radio but also a harsh truth of the difficult conditions under which radio operates right now. I also suspect, sadly, that Pennine will not be the last to close this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My understanding is that the licence is being given back to Ofcom. I wonder if they let anyone have another go?&#8221;</p>
<p>To date none of the other licence &#8216;hand-backs&#8217; have been re-advertised &#8211; with the exception of Diamond FM in Plymouth, who won a licence but never launched.</p>
<p>Those licences now coming up for re-advertisement that don&#8217;t qualify for automatic renewal because of qualifying DAB carriage, are currently only being re-awarded until 31/12/2015 &#8211; which is also the cut-off for all other licences. Such a short-term period is unlikely to prove attractive to potential new applicants who would have to launch a station from scratch.</p>
<p>Presumably Pennine FM had sought a potential buyer but none was forthcoming.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad day for radio but also a harsh truth of the difficult conditions under which radio operates right now. I also suspect, sadly, that Pennine will not be the last to close this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/goodbye-pennine-fm-again-again/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=2135#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been given a decent burial, let&#039;s not dig the corpse up once more. 107.9 went through several regime changes in ownership and management - and after twelve years, no-one, it seems, could take it close to profitability. From hyper-local as a stand-alone operation to being part of a would-be&#039;big&#039; sounding network, none of the approaches have borne fruit. Time to let it go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been given a decent burial, let&#8217;s not dig the corpse up once more. 107.9 went through several regime changes in ownership and management &#8211; and after twelve years, no-one, it seems, could take it close to profitability. From hyper-local as a stand-alone operation to being part of a would-be&#8217;big&#8217; sounding network, none of the approaches have borne fruit. Time to let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

