James Cridland

James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

DAB plus in the UK

Posted on Thursday, March 22nd, 2007 at 12:30am. #

I notice I’m quoted in a piece by the anti-DAB campaigner Steve Green, who is claiming all manner of things about Quentin Howard, who holds both presidency of WorldDMB, and is CEO of the UK commercial multiplex owner Digital One.

Steve’s website is inaccurate about many things, and he has been deeply unpleasant to me a number of times. I have no time for his fevered outpourings of personal venom towards people within the digital radio industry. He has little time for me, it must be said, either.

However, in a bold move, he’s using a personal post in my own blog to back up an argument of his own; albeit assuming that this blog accurately reflects my employer’s views (it doesn’t), and crediting me with a little more responsbility than I actually have.

Quentin says in an interview:

BBC interviewer: What is DAB+ going to mean, and have people wasted their money?
Quentin Howard: The answer is nothing in this country. DAB+ is an additional standard that has been passed by the WorldDMB organisation for use in countries who haven’t started DAB yet. It doesn’t affect anything in this country, and Ofcom, who you talked about earlier in the programme, there’s their technical standards and the advertisement for the next national multiplex [he holds up two Ofcom documents]; they both specifically say that you can’t use DAB+ in this country, only the existing standard.

Quentin’s Ofcom argument is entirely right – and kudos on him for his props. Accurately, Ofcom currently treat AAC+ (the technical standard behind DAB+) as ‘data’ and not as ’sound’. There’s nothing to stop me, or you, slinging a 64k AAC+ service onto a suitably free multiplex anywhere in the UK, under a data licence. Ofcom would take that 64k out of the proportion of a multiplex’s capacity that can be given over to data. Since it’s not recognised as a radio service, I’d have no radio licence, so music rights agreements are rather more painful; and there’s the small matter of no sets being available to pick the thing up, but the fact is that I could, if a multiplex owner let me, broadcast an AAC+ signal tomorrow: as long as you recognise that it’s not, technically speaking, a radio station.

But DAB+ will come to the UK, as I’ve said in the past. Let me qualify that – I do believe it’ll be quite some time coming; probably many years into the future. There should be absolutely no concern about buying a DAB set now, because it will receive radio for many, many years to come. The radio industry will not want to make over four million sets obsolete overnight. If you haven’t bought a DAB set, there is no point in waiting: buy one now, and enjoy many more radio stations, with more functionality (like programme schedules and live pause) and no frequencies to remember. Prices start from £39. I recommend Virgin Radio Classic Rock, Chill, and LBC – all digital-only stations in parts of the country.

Quentin does both his jobs very effectively, with a confident personal style and a clear vision. His appearance here, flagged as Digital One CEO, was a typically bullish and polished performance. It may be entirely correct for the Digital One CEO to claim that the Digital One multiplex will never use DAB+ – it’s his multiplex, and he’s in charge. It is similarly correct to claim that there are no plans to bring DAB+ to the UK. There are none. At all.

However, it is a WorldDMB standard. If Ofcom sanctions DAB+, and if there is interest from broadcasters, and if the market conditions are right (ie enough compatible sets in the market), it will happen. It’s peculiar for the man who helped get the DAB+ standard through his own WorldDMB organisation to claim it won’t _ever_ be a broadcast standard in this country; but unlike Steve, I don’t believe he did this on purpose. Journalists, as I’m to discover again tomorrow at a Guardian conference, have a canny knack of putting even the cleverest people off-message.

Disclosure: I am responsible for additional programme-related broadcast data around my employer’s audio programmes across new platforms, which include Digital One and other DAB multiplexes. My employer is not a WorldDMB member and has a multi-platform policy. I never blog here on behalf of my employer; I am quite capable of independent thought occasionally.

7 comments

Julius said at March 24th, 2007 at 7:40pm

Dear Craig

Here are a few links to Steve Greens ramblings on the usenet. I think people will understand who and what this person is and wether they should take him serious.

These two links shows his most used aliases :

http://snipurl.com/p70j
http://snipurl.com/p71j

Keep up the great work!

Richard said at April 3rd, 2007 at 2:09pm

Bottom line is that Steve Green has spent a lot of time and energy debunking DAB sound quality on his site but where he loses credibility for me at least is that the guy is quite happy to give out nasty and personal comments to anyone who dares challenge him. He’s spammed alt.digital.radio to point that the board is useless and he’s spending a lot of time and effort to keep re-editing the DAB page on wikipedia.

He gives no credit to portable reception or robustness of the signal, as his only point of reference is a hifi FM tuner connected to a rooftop antenna. He cares not a jot that the majority of radio listeners listen in the car or in the kitchen on a portable radio.

Jose Fernandez said at August 23rd, 2008 at 1:53pm

Will UK manufacturers of DAB radios start selling DAB+ portable models in the near future?…and, if so, when?
I am holding back before buying a DAB portable radio as I do not want something that could be obsolete in a couple of years or so.

Will Copeland said at October 14th, 2008 at 10:19pm

It’s true I like most others, listen on portable radio. DAB as far as I can tell offers me no benefits. Sound quality isn’t noticeably better. Clarity on spoken voice has improved a little and it is perhaps true that DAB is an improvement on AM, but truthfully AM was always adequate. On the whole I tune into Classic FM and Radio 2 using FM because the sound quality is noticeably better. I do listen to Radio 3 on DAB and can’t hear a lot of difference between FM and DAB. About £90 pounds was spent originally on a digital radio, approximately £60 of which obviously wasted.

derek said at September 24th, 2009 at 3:14am

I bought a dab for my hi fi , and i have a denon reciver for FM dab was so very dissaponting even with a good signal in london , you get the “space monkies ” noise in the back ground , i took back unit good a cambridge audio , audiophile unit , same low quility compared to FM , i got a full refund on item as its not fit for perpose low quility sold as hi fi , hi fidelity it is not just suitable for little portables and low grade units , i woont be going there agin , if FM ends i will no longer bother with radio .

Richard Booth said at November 27th, 2009 at 3:28pm

I have been using DAB since around 1999, when there were plenty of test transmissions, and overall, I have to say I love dab radio. I have a Roberts in the Kitchen, and it works beautifully, I have a Sony clock radio in the bedroom, which also provides me with faultless LBC at night… A vintage Technics ST-GT1000 in the Audio system, which, with higher bitrate transmissions, sounds superb, A Vita Audio in the dining room, which has a lovely tone :) A sony 6650 in the car, You can see I have adopted the technology, and yes, it does have its flaws, but overall its great. I am in Croydon, south London, and the signal there is not at all bad. Even the Sony in the car, with a standard Whip aeriel provides great service.

Embrace the technology and understand its limitations! noise and interference on FM used to drive me nuts!

Rich

robert in UK said at January 28th, 2010 at 6:47pm

I know that DAB Plus is not available in UK, but on the south coast, it should be received on a DAB Plus receiver (Pure Mini) direct from French station (france Bleu). can anyone confirm this ?
Robert

Leave a comment

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.

This website uses Gravatars (the pretty pictures of commenters). Upload yours here.

Additional comments powered by BackType