James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

DAB in Yorkshire

Posted on Monday, November 15th, 2010 at 4:07 pm. #

The hills over Huddersfield

I get contacted by a few students, and am happy to respond to questions, so long as I can mercilessly re-use this information in a blog posting. And, with that in mind… hello, Chloe, who contacts me and says…

I am writing my MA dissertation on the public perception of DAB in Yorkshire and have been reading your blog with great interest over the past few months. As part of my research I conducted a survey and would like to put my findings to you.

Oooh.

I have found that there is a lack of understanding of the radio switchover and a dissatisfaction with reception and content especially in rural areas.

Not surprised there’s a lack of understanding about the switchover; none’s been announced. If one was, of course, there’d be rather more understanding.

The only thing that’s been said is that if we reach 50% digital listening by 2013 (we won’t) then the government will force large FM broadcasters off the dial in 2015 (they’d be mad to in an election year, and the market should decide in any case).

In terms of reception – not surprised in Yorkshire: first, it’s quite hilly; and second, the houses are built rather solidly in that part of the world: big thick sandstone walls don’t normally work too well with any type of radio reception, even FM. Reception’s something that the industry knows it needs to work on. That said, it works fine in West Yorkshire (in a car and at home) in my experience: indeed, I even got the Manchester multiplex too.

Dissatisfaction around content is less straightforward. There’s an awful lot of additional content on DAB in Yorkshire; whether the successful services like Magic, new services like Rock Radio, or the current additional services like Absolute Radio 80s and BBC 6music. Extra services from existing brands works well, but it’s also very clear that the radio industry has yet to properly market these to audiences, particularly audiences who have yet to purchase a DAB radio. It’s a marketing problem, I’d suggest, rather than a content problem.

My main finding is that DAB is being overtaken by other technologies such as DTV and radio online. May I have your opinion of these preliminary findings?

My opinion of that? You’re talking rubbish.

DAB accounts for 15.4% of all radio listening; DTV accounts for 4.5% of all radio listening; Internet Radio accounts for 2.8% of all radio listening. (RAJAR, Q3 2010), so the audience clearly doesn’t think so.

Reception of internet radio while mobile is expensive and unreliable, unlike broadcast radio. Reception of DTV while mobile is impossible; and DTV (at least, radio via Freeview) has less content than DAB. On Sky, DTV has just two Yorkshire-based radio stations (Yorkshire Radio and Galaxy). There’s no way that broadcast radio can be replaced with DTV or, at least for the next ten years, with internet-delivered radio.

In terms of broadcast radio – given the choice between FM and DAB, both are equally valid, but DAB delivers considerably more choice, and is (whisper it) considerably more robust, too: unless you like the pirate radio stations of Temple Newsam stomping all over your signal, or you’re a particular fan of the hiss you get from the low signal in many of the Pennine valleys.

If you look on paper, DAB’s technology might look slightly old-fashioned; but a proper comparison of the platforms leads to a simple answer: that the future of radio is multi-platform, not based on one technology; and that if you want a lot of choice, in a mobile environment, with cheap, low-powered radio sets, then DAB is the only sensible broadcast foundation. (Use internet radio for niche, non-geographical services; and use DTV, or internet, for high-quality audio in a stationary setting).

To ignore the cost of receivers and mobile reception when choosing a radio platform – and, of course, audience behaviour – will give you an odd result if you’re planning the future of radio. It’s not all about the technology, but about the whole listener environment – something that many commentators don’t appear to grasp. Make sure you don’t make that same mistake; and best of luck with your MA dissertation. Any chance of a copy when you’ve finished it?

2 comments

Stu
commenting at November 15th, 2010 at 4:44 pm

My grandparents live on the West Yorks/North Yorks border and when I was there yesterday my grandad was talking about the digital TV switchover, which is happening in Yorks in 2011. He thought that radio would be going digital at the same time so had been looking at some in-car DAB adapters. I’ve put him straight and he’s happy now that his new car won’t be out of date by next year. I blame the TV people for just calling it ‘digital switchover’ and not making clear that it’s just TV.

Stu M
commenting at March 30th, 2011 at 1:28 pm

(Different Stu from above!)

I live in Harrogate, about 160m from sea level. I get a clear line of site to Bilsdale – yet I get a very poor DAB signal. I also live about 300m from the Harlow Transmitter, which is supposed to be putting out DAB.

It’s in towns like Harrogate that I don’t understand why more isn’t done with DAB. I’m pretty sure DAB radios were selling well here over Christmas, yet the signal is poor. Getting stations like Absolute is great, but the amount of crack-up is terrible.

I don’t know – I just think that it feels like an antique technology that will be surpassed before it is allowed to take hold. It feels like around the home, internet radio will win in the end – anecdotally, I admit, but I get a much clearer audio using TuneIn Radio on my iPad than I do over DAB. And if anyone switches the microwave oven on in the house, our DAB goes haywire.

I hope digital radio – in whatever form it takes – does win in the end, because I think it lends itself better to a wider variety of regional choice, rather than local sameness.

Leave a comment

Here's my commenting policy