James Cridland

James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

DAB Digital Radio in the UK, Italy, and Denmark

Posted on Thursday, June 4th, 2009 at 12:23pm. #

I’m at the EBU’s Digital Radio Conference, understanding more about how digital radio is being taken up across the European and Arabic States.

One of the most useful reasons to come to these conferences is to understand what is going on outside the UK. And, naturally, the rest of the world is keen to understand what’s happening within the UK. So, naturally, I got to hear from Grant Goddard (with a bit of a challenging presentation), then Denmark Radio, and finally RAI from Italy. So, here are my notes:

Grant Goddard – challenges in the UK

He quickly rushed through some positive things about DAB Digital Radio. Then pointed out that Ofcom’s forecasts in 2006 for digital listening said that we’d be at 35% by now; we’re actually at 20%. Similarly, RadioCentre’s forecasts have been out of kilter with where we actually are. And then goes through a lot of other forecasts which have all gone a bit wrong. Erk. What’s very clear is that forecasts are very rarely right. (Curiously, he doesn’t badmouth any Enders Analysis research, where he used to work. Nothing to do with their forecasts being even more wrong; predicting in some iPhone research that nobody would buy the iPod Touch, and significantly underestimating the takeup of the iPhone too, but anyway).

Then he goes through a few challenges to DAB in the UK. I’m expecting about four or five. Let’s see how many we get:

First challenge is the lack of consumer awareness of “digital radio” – at least, what the term actually means. 90% of the population have access to it, yet a much smaller amount actually thinks they have access to it.

Second challenge is RAJAR – which is limited to traditional, linear, radio. No listen-again; no last.fm or Spotify; nothing. Compares a different RAJAR survey (PALVIS?), and says that internet radio, in total, is probably similar in terms of reach to DAB Digital Radio. (I probably don’t disagree – reach is very different to hours).

Third challenge, he says, is the volume of legacy analogue radios in the marketplace currently. And points out that only 22% of new radios sold in the UK are DAB – the rest are analogue. And he points out that total radio sales is on a downward slope.

Fourth challenge, therefore, he says is a declining radio receiver market. People are buying less radios.

Fifth challenge, he says, is that DAB purchasing growth has moved into negative territory – i.e. less people bought a DAB radio receiver this year than last year). (It’s a recession, Grant. That’s kind of what happens in recessions. And DAB has held its head up high in comparison to other consumer electronics.)

Sixth challenge is mobile: he points that 34 million handsets were sold in the UK last year; only 2 million DAB radios. And he says that only 9% of people bother to use the FM radio in their phones. 45% of mobile phones will have FM radio by 2011 – but there aren’t any mobiles with DAB Digital Radio in them yet.

Seventh challenge: DAB coverage isn’t as good as FM

Eighth challenge: there’s not much incentive for FM switch-off. 88% of consumers are satisfied with their existing choice of stations, he says, so people don’t need more choice. There’s no real reuse idea for FM yet.

Ninth challenge: that the DAB rollout in the UK has gone a little slower recently – lots of new multiplexes simply haven’t launched.

Tenth challenge: that coverage is fairly uneven, because of different multiplexes covering different areas.

Eleventh challenge: that DAB reception isn’t very good. (Um, that’s probably the same as the seventh challenge.)

Twelfth challenge: the content on digital radio isn’t very good. He points out that only 5% of commercial radio listening is to exlusively digital content. And only 3% of BBC radio listening is to exclusively digital content, he says. He says that this isn’t growing.

Thirteenth challenge: DAB doesn’t really give you much extra choice – mostly they’re simulcast services.

Fourteenth challenge: quite a few digital-only services have been switched off. Might be related to 12th.

Fifteenth challenge: carriage costs are really high

Sixteenth challenge: DAB digital radios in the main aren’t “mobile”. Most of the listening is in the home. So that’s bad too.

Seventeenth challenge: DAB+ won’t come to the UK because there are so many receivers out there with MP2.

Eighteenth challenge: other platforms – internet, television – are doing well. The average DAB owner is 46 years old. And only 17% of those are aged under 35. So he says DAB isn’t really very interesting to young people.

Nineteenth challenge: DAB/FM combo receivers are the norm. This is apparently a bad thing, though I don’t quite see why.

Twentieth challenge: it’s cost £500m to roll out DAB. And he says that DAB investment is proving too costly.

And finally (!) the twenty-first challenge is that apparently digital switchover is unlikely to happen. Not quite sure why: the reasons whisked off the screen pretty quickly. And apparently he said that 50% of radio listening will be digital by 2019.

Well, with that positive writeup, I’m chirpy and chipper about the future of my industry. I wonder what he’d say about FM!

Erik Heinz Kjeldsen from DR – digital radio in Denmark

He hopes that his presentation will be a bit more optimistic than the story from the UK. Me too!

So, in Denmark…

DAB receiver penetration is about 30% of population. Fairly evenly distributed with age, men/women, geographical. And 25% of people who don’t have them expect to buy them in the next 12 months. Monthly reach for DAB listening is 40%; but market share is about 10%. (Similar to the UK, he points out).

He points out that the Danish radio market is interesting. Public service has a 75% share. There are two national commercial stations – one with 80% coverage, one with just 40%. So, the remaining 25% is divided between these national stations, and regional stations, and local stations – and unfortunately, there was a bidding war for the licences, which means that it’s difficult to make these a profitable concern. Radio’s only got a few % share of the total advertising market, and it’s a falling share – they’ve not really done very well dealing with the media agencies. So, he says that it’s a hard marketplace.

Choice is driving DAB in Denmark: but in Denmark, it’s a different deal from the UK – because listeners move from very little choice on analogue to quite a lot more. Get a DAB receiver and you get 14 DR public service channels (10 new stations), and 3 commercial radio stations.

He reckons that DAB has the capability to restart the radio market in Denmark. 3 of the top 5 DAB offerings are DAB only channels – each bigger than known brands from FM. And commercial radio’s coverage is strengthened markedly. I asked what those top 3 stations are for your benefit, dear reader – one is a young-female soft-CHR (I’m guessing a slightly younger Magic/Heart). Another is a localised older audience service (kind of BBC local radio). And finally, the third is a popular folk music channel (and heaven knows what the equivalent of that is in the UK!).

He reckons Denmark will be first to switch off FM, and says they urgently need a date. He reckons 50% is unrealistic. But he wants to work together with the rest of the EU, to get radio receivers in the car, and pan-European commitment to DAB. And “We need each other”. We do indeed. A good fact-filled presentation.

Guiseppe Baccini, from Rai Way – DAB in Italy

Rai Way is 100% owned by RAI, the first Italian TV broadcasting company. Rai Way is kind of the equivalent of BBC Transmission, from what I kind of understand, except it still exists, obviously. Rai Way also does the broadcasting for commercial broadcasters on DAB in Italy – and also many other countries, including Tunisia.

In Italy, about 60% of the population is covered by DAB for RAI.

He says that “they need receivers”. They’re looking for the EBU Profile 2 receiver for Italy, to do enriched audio with slideshow and BIFS. But then he talks about the French approach, using DMB-A, as not an optimal solution.

He shows some of the work they’re doing with slideshow (which he’s calling SLS). He’s also running something called IsoRadio, which is a slideshow and DLS-text channel giving you travel information, alongside a radio station that gives you traffic and weather. He’s also running TPEG trials – he’s implemented RTM, NWS and WEA are coming soon, and TEJ, HEI and KPW are planned. (I’ve made those last three up – I’ve no idea what they were).

Interestingly, they’re also planning to use DMB to broadcast Parliament, using BIFS to enable you to get the text of the speeches as well as live video. (A clever idea, this – it panders to the egos of Parliament, but also gets quite a good amount of content to really give this a good test.)

In Tunisia, they’re working on DVB-T, DAB and DRM. For DAB, they’re running a pilot project. They’ve planned lots, but they need to get approval from someone in Italy to continue.

He reckons that a switchover from FM radio to internet radio simply isn’t possible, and he reckons, therefore, that digital radio is important.

More from this conference later.

Photo: Amy Keus. Used under licence – thanks!

14 comments

Bev MARKS
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 2:00pm

Yes 9=11 and true: DAB coverage, thus reception is no where near as good as FM, so what hope is the question I have posed several times before in various forums? Ofcom and BBC et al have to sort out before any hope of wow factor reception in portable radios. In the meantime new DAB Tx sites all over the place does not help the fundamental need for working out power levels needed to deliver satisfactory signal strength at 1 metre above ground level where radio is best as a mobile medium for “walk-radios”/phones with DAB receivers.

Per G
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 3:08pm

Challenge n:o one: a more active EBU issuing recommendations to all its members to start digital broadcasts, to start plannning switchovers from FM to DAB, to work towards a paneuropean coverage, to ….

Roger Durrant
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 3:15pm

Grant Gooddard styles himself “Radio Expert. Who is he kidding? His analysis is substandard and flawed, his agenda is so biased it is unbelievable. Why on earth the EBU invited him is beyond me.
As someone else recently said, Stop carping Grant and be part of the solution not the problem.

Ian Devlin
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 3:31pm

21 challenges! Some are valid, others aren’t… my thoughts on a select few.

Certainly #15 is spot on for the voluntary sector of radio, £50k+ (if memory serves me correctly) is simply too much compared to approx. £2k for an FM community/LPFM license.

I agree with you James on #19, it allows for a possible switch-off of FM in the future but allowing easy migration to DAB.

As for #16 as soon as Apple make an iPod DAB radio remote… sorted!

#21: the voluntary/community sector. Since OFCOM started licensing FM/AM frequencies for community stations it’ll be a brave person to then force them to jump to DAB transmission considering the new (and more expensive) outlay for equipment.

I’ll save my thoughts on the other points because he’s missed the biggie: car radio. I don’t see radio switching over to digital until there’s significant (50%+) in-car switchover… and it would also be nice to have one single digital radio standard in the EU.

James Cridland
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 3:37pm

Per: the EBU have achieved a significant win with their pan-European digital receiver profiles; and they are a union, not an authority. Having said that, that’s an interesting viewpoint.

Roger: I can’t pretend I see eye to eye with all of Grant’s views; however, from this viewpoint, much of what Grant says is true – not substandard nor flawed. It does occur to me that his challenges might contradict each other – compare challenge 8 (“people don’t want choice”) with 12,13,14 (“there isn’t enough choice”). The point is that the technology isn’t at fault here – it’s the industry. And I hope the people here understand that.

John Handelaar
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 4:22pm

And TV used to think it had it bad, with only three competing TX formats.

Roger Durrant
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 7:24pm

(I have removed much of this comment after a complaint on 15th July by Grant Goddard – James).

The trouble with the radio industry is they keep giving him a platform. When will it learn?

Bev MARKS
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 8:33pm

Does it help if I try and decode some of the TLAs and other words from the RAI Way presentation?

TPEG uses many three letter abbreviations (TLAs) and these are given with full explanation in the TISA (Traveller Information Services Association) Guideline (TAWG 09030)titled: “TPEG Nomenclature and Abbreviations – April 2009″. This publication is intended for Members only, but I can give a sneak post-view comment from it, having authored the content!

TPEG = Transport Protocol Expert Group (pronounced “T-Peg”)

Currently published TPEG applications (Binary data physical format)include:
TPEG-RTM = Road Traffic Messages
TPEG-LOC = Location referencing for applications
TPEG-PTI = Public Transport Information
TPEG-SNI = Service and Network Information
TPEG-TEC = Traffic Event Compact

TISA is currently working on a number of new applications:
TPEG-PKI = Parking Information
TPEG-CAI = Conditional Access Information
TPEG-FPI = Fuel price Information
TPEG=SPI = Speed Information
TPEG-WEA = Weather Information
etc

TISA has a number of Use Case Proposals for yet more TPEG applications, which will be developed in the near future.

Maybe that helps to see that TPEG is quite wide ranging in its focus for applications.

IsoRadio = using a single frequency FM channel on autostrada from multiple transmitter sites

James Cridland
commenting at June 4th, 2009 at 9:45pm

Roger, I don’t know about Grant, but character assassinations won’t help on this blog. At best, it will look as if I’m attacking his views: at worst, he might accuse me of defamation, since so allow your comments to be published.

Probably best that if you have any allegations, you publish these yourself, rather than use my blog.

I don’t agree with a Grant’s views, but that’s no excuse for some personal attacks.

Mark Smith
commenting at June 6th, 2009 at 8:51pm

Community stations can’t easily access DAB without entering into expensive licensing arrangements with the multiplex contractors. You can’t just put up an DAB transmitter like you can FM (albeit with an OFCOM licence). OFCOM are only offering two FM frequencies in the whole of inner London for community stations like ours, which is scandalous. If we had decent access to DAB then that would be a start but it is far too geared up for large broadcasters covering a big area. There is little democracy here and it’s no wonder that smaller niche stations are going to the wall.

Tony Orwin
commenting at June 10th, 2009 at 1:31pm

Re: Mark Smiths comments on Community Radio on DAB.

My colleagues and I here at RadioScape have come up with a number of proposals to deliver the capability for community Radio to access the technology – but have to date not received the backing to continue.

The feed back I received being that there was not sufficiant interest.

Michael Lloyd
commenting at October 4th, 2009 at 6:22pm

Probably too late to leave this comment now …but for me the big problem with DAB is that we are being offered something of worse quality than FM, and not given any ‘choice’ about it.

This is not a purely subjective point, as the DAB supporters will pretend. The digital bit rates in the UK are very low, especially for the pop stations. It doesn’t have to be so bad – but so long as commercial interests put profit before quality then it won’t improve.

Sad, but there it is.

Stuart Minchin
commenting at October 30th, 2009 at 8:18am

G’day from an Australia currently grappling with the new technology!!! ITS A WINNER, as:

(1) Every major commercial and ABC (state broadcaster) network has got on board, with simulcast services in the five major markets (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth);

(2) Tangible promises of even more stations to come, with the community sector guaranteed to have a share (currently in Sydney – where I’m writing from – you get a choice of around 30 stations);

(3) Major retail chains such as Harvey Norman and Dick Smith getting right behind sales initiatives for sets;

(4) Masts for DAB+ stations being placed at the top of very high FM / TV towers, guaranteeing optimum reception (even though, yes, you get the odd “Max Headroom” effect for those of us who remember the stuttering 80′s TV icon);

(5) Reception often being better for AM’ers in DAB+ mode than in AM mode (we all know of the experience of storms ruining our AM reception – not with DIGITAL!!!);

(6) Promotional days being held in public spaces such as Sydney’s popular Martin Plaza, featuring pop bands and gorilla suited men to win over the kids to the new band;

(7) Announcers freely talking about the technology and inviting callers with DAB+ sets (like me) to ring them and bore everyone silly by going on about how much choice and quality these new stations have;

(8) The new anticipation of markets being excitingly challenged and new stars being made out of the technology (such as Gorilla brekky announcer Mike Goldman); and

(9) The chance to contour reception footprints more fully, and get around FM bands being totally full (as they pretty much are in the five major Aussie radio markets!!!)

DAB IS HERE TO STAY!!! AND ITS FAST GAINING FRIENDS IN THE LAND DOWN UNDER!!!!!!!!!!!

Phil Challis
commenting at February 23rd, 2010 at 10:40am

When DAB first came out the sets were very expensive but they have reduced in price. DAB has not grown in popularity as expected and therefore the manufacturers are not achieving economies of scale. I believe that the lack of a common standard throughout europe hinders growth. You only have to consider Betamax and the standard becoming VHS.

Leave a comment

Here's my commenting policy

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.

Additional comments powered by BackType