James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

Content compliance

Posted on Monday, March 30th, 2009 at 8:44 pm. #

An Astro dish

“You might find this rather unusual,” said my guide, ushering me through some doors.

I’d gone to visit Astro, the Malaysian version of BSkyB, to catch up with an old friend and for the chance to look around. Astro runs a ton of radio stations, but I was looking around the television area – seeing lots of monitors and complicated robotic machines that loaded video recorders up with tapes (part of their archival project, I later discovered).

But it was this room that, indeed, I did find rather unusual. There were about thirty desks here, arranged in diagonal formations allowing one person to glance around the other three. Hunched in front of each desk was someone sitting there, watching the television.

“This is our Content Compliance unit,” said my guide – a friendly Indian man.

Malaysia is, rather to my surprise, a muslim country. It doesn’t feel like it in Kuala Lumpur, particularly with the humidity, the high commercialism of the endless shopping malls, and the apparent tolerance of other religions (there was a Cantonese temple at the bottom of the street where the hotel was, for example, and bars abound), but nevertheless, a muslim country.

Accordingly, there are strict rules on what can, and can’t, be shown on television. And, accordingly, nothing can be broadcast on television which is against the country’s law: no swearing, no poor morals, certainly no nudity. The law also requires advertisements to be Malaysian (yes, advertise Coke, but ensure it’s a Malaysian advert for it).

So, the content compliance unit must watch television channels that go out, and substitute advertisements and content where required. A typical shift within the content compliance unit lasts for twelve hours, working on some easy channels (those showing live golf) and some rather harder-to-comply channels (those showing music videos).

Sitting on the side was a booklet containing a list of banned songs. It was a thick document, probably containing two or three thousand songs. I picked it up and had a quick look. I looked under Michael Jackson and Britney Spears – many banned songs for each artist, though none that I instantly recognised. (“If you seek Amy”, the brilliantly-titled new song from la Spears, hadn’t yet made the list.)

What essentially happens is that all channels are placed in a delay; people sit and watch these channels, and substitute – on the fly – content that is not allowed to be shown with content that is.

So, a movie channel that had scheduled Brokeback Mountain might discover that, in Malaysia, it was broadcasting something else at that time. That’s easy. Harder is substituting three-minute music videos, or changing the ad breaks within live business news channels to contain nothing but Malaysian-sold advertising breaks, or promotions for other Astro channels. Harder still to edit an episode of ‘Friends’ to make it conform to muslim behaviour, I’d guess.

“These guys are really important,” said my guide, pointing at the rows of hunched people looking at screens. “At the end of the day, they are responsible for our licence. If they miss something, we’ll go out of business. The entire operation.”

My rather trite comment as we entered of “You’re paying these people to watch telly, basically” was obvious for its shallowness. No. They’re paying these people to keep the whole company operating.

I found it fascinating. Others might find it horrifying. But, Astro weren’t apologetic about what they do, and didn’t hide this from me (in spite of knowing where I work). This is, in my view, a necessary activity to enable Astro to run a successful business in Malaysia and throughout the South Asian subcontinent.

And in reality, this is no different to the censorship actively taken within the US, the home of “Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction” or the almost complete absence of world news. Try and find Al Jazeera on a US cable network, and then tell me censorship doesn’t exist in the ‘land of the free’. And it’s no different to the censorship actively taken within the UK, where we are similarly unable to simply rebroadcast US channels’ advertising, nor able to broadcast various content on our television channels to fit in with our cultural norms. The muslims may have different views; it doesn’t make them wrong.

An interesting day.

7 comments

Steve Martin
commenting at March 30th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

A fascinating insight James, and great access. Funny how a country’s borders have extended into a tv control room. I wonder whether you’d ever get to see the equivalent operation in China. Chinese compliance is equally quick-fingered, substituting individual reports from news channels, for example.

My experience of the US cable deals from my time at BBC World News tv would suggest that Al Jazeera and other international news channels struggle to gain carriage largely because of a perceived lack of market viability rather than any calculated censorship. AJ would love to gain carriage in the US and I reckon would happily provide a locally compliant feed in return for the exposure.

Adam Bowie
commenting at March 31st, 2009 at 11:07 am

I’d take strong issue with your claim that “this is no different to the censorship actively taken within the US.”

I’d suggest that “censoring” the news is just a tiny bit different to “not covering” the news. ABC’s World News Tonight might not have as much world news as the BBC’s, but that’s more an issue of America’s insular nature. BBC’s World News gets broadcast on plenty of PBS stations. If someone wants to broadcast world news in the US, the only thing preventing them is finding an economic model!

While a bunch of US cable operators might somehow equate Al Jazeera with terrorism in their own minds and not let the station get carriage, that’s somewhat different to editing out any coverage of Middle Eastern politics altogther from your bulletins (or those of overseas operators).

And this is the country that’s just shut down two opposition newspapers.

And as for rebroadcasting of US advertising in the UK: that’s more to do wit a combination of copyrights (did the US advertiser licence music for global broadcast?), and Ofcom/EU rules regarding the quantity of advertising allowed on TV. That’s not censorship.

James Cridland
commenting at April 2nd, 2009 at 2:07 am

Adam,

My point is that removal of portions of entertainment programmes to reflect local sensitivities is a practice that occurs everywhere. Broadcasters everywhere try to avoid offence by not transmitting certain content of programmes. The UK doesn’t have dramatically different morals to the US, for example – so we’re unlikely to dramatically edit US programmes (though we do – requesting a bleeped/blurred version of The Daily Show, for example). Muslim countries have significantly different morals; and channels are edited as a result (either live on-the-fly or by pre-editing episodes of programmes for these territories).

What Astro are doing (reflecting Muslim law) is no different from what More4 do (reflecting UK/EU law). You can legitimately call both censorship – because it is, in effect – or legitimately call both just simple common sense.

I wasn’t talking about censoring news in my posting above – simply editing entertainment TV channels to reflect a different set of morals. (I don’t deny that the company also edits news, incidentally. That’s not the point of this blog posting.)

Adam Bowie
commenting at April 2nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm

I take your point about entertainment programmes, and of course we do edit for local sensitivities.

Of course what Astro’s doing is different to what More4 or UK broadcasters do. There are certainly UK/EU laws about what’s legally transmittable, but swearing, sex or nudity are generally allowable after the watershed. Programme makers and channels know this, and schedule accordingly. That’s why Phil and Fern don’t swear throughout This Morning (It’s also worth noting that The Daily Show is bleeped and blurred in the US as well due to unfathomable rules regarding “basic” cable and “premium” cable).

Bandying around the word “censorship” is dangerous. Censorship is a real problem for many people in many parts of the world where the state has a heavy hand. There’s a world of difference between editing an episode of Midsomer Murders so that it can be shown at 3pm, and not allowing it to be broadcast at all.

AndrewM
commenting at April 2nd, 2009 at 10:31 pm

Of course, in the UK, US etc. individual channels are responsible for what they broadcast, not the platform operators. Is it the other way around in Malaysia because so few of the channels are broadcasting Malaysia-specific feeds?

gareth
commenting at April 7th, 2009 at 10:30 am

I remember when I was there, it took me a day or so before I twigged that Top of the Hour on news channels wasn’t actually happening at the top of the hour but about 90 seconds afterwards… I was then watching the news channels trying to see if any of it felt butchered.

Laura McNeill
commenting at April 16th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

Hi there,
I worked for Astro TV as a sound consultant from near the beginning. At this time they used young women for the content control but after a while changed their policy to use older women as they felt the young ones were being influenced, stressed or traumatised by what they were viewing, cant remember exactly what they said but I remember the sentiment.The parent company Measat owns the satellites so they were down streaming for re broadcast, hence the content control, programmes took at least 1 hour to turn around. The footprint being over south east Asia.Even though it wasnt supposed to be government controlled, they still had influence, the TV news channel was pulled about the week before launch and the head of news disappeared back to NZ. Having experienced working there I dont believe its so different from here, we are just controlled in a different more subtle way.
Still, fascinating to be there and be part of such a huge digital organisation.

Leave a comment

Here's my commenting policy