James Cridland

James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

Apple’s new iPod Nano – the saviour of Radio 1?

Posted on Thursday, September 10th, 2009 at 4:05am. #

iPod Touch

The iPod Touch (above) and iPhone may be where the geeks are at; but the iPod Nano is a much more popular music player. Actually: it’s the world’s most popular: over 100,000,000 have been sold (yes, really, it’s that much). And I’d wager that the Nano is owned by younger people than the expensive Touch/iPhones – because it’s smaller, more robust, and needs no contract.

The surprise is in the press release announcing the new one today, just in time for Christmas:

iPod nano now has a built-in FM radio with live pause and iTunes Tagging. Live pause lets iPod nano users pause and resume playing their favorite FM radio shows. iTunes Tagging is great when users hear a song they like, they can simply tag it, and then preview and purchase that song when they sync to iTunes

This is the first consumer unit that I can think of that does ‘live pause’ for FM. (In the UK, we’ve plenty of DAB radios that do it – but not FM.) This is great news. It’s a new feature added to FM radio, delivered by Apple.

The images and video on Apple’s website appear to show a big screen with a frequency on it (yawn), but some RDS-delivered(?) information. “This is the world-famous KROQ”, says one of the screenshots, which presumably means it’s using RDS RadioText, the long description that few stations bother with in the UK. Now’s the time to check what your RDS encoder is putting there – or better still, add a live dynamic feed like your DAB’s DLS text (“livetext”). You are creating dynamic text at least, aren’t you? And now’s the time to work out how you can monetise this. Many stations have already monetised DAB DLS text. Is this monetiseable too? Can it push up yield?

iTunes Tagging is “currently available only in the US on radio stations that support iTunes Tagging” – so we’ll not be seeing it here for a while. It’s bad news for radio companies and for the consumer, since it’s proprietary to iTunes – so I can’t buy my MP3s from Amazon, and radio stations are locked in to iTunes – indeed, they can’t even sell anything that’s not in the iTunes store (Beatles, anyone?). iTunes Tagging is rubbish for stations playing live music, rubbish for stations playing something out of the ordinary, rubbish for feedback from commercials or features, and rubbish for speech stations. It’s not what the radio industry needs, or wants – though it’s undeniably better than nothing.

The functionality in the (albeit nascent) RadioTAG application for RadioDNS has been carefully designed to be much more open than iTunes Tagging (it works on any music store; supports podcast subscriptions, fact sheets or commercial opportunities too); so you’d expect me to be nothing but negative about Apple’s effort. I’m not, though. I’m delighted.

Because RadioTAG is now much easier to explain. “You know that iTunes Tagging? It’s like that, but better.” (Or in the case of the UK – “It’s like that, but it works here, too”.)

So today is a good day for radio. A new iPod Nano with a built-in FM radio can only be good news. One that offers live-pause is good – adding features users will be familiar with. One that introduces the idea of tagging, albeit in a flawed manner, is good too. Thank you, Apple, for introducing FM radio to a new set of fans.

(One word of caution, though. Let’s not run away with this. The iPod Nano has sold 100,000,000 units – since February 7, 2005. That’s roughly 5,000,000 units per quarter. That’s big. But Nokia sells 100,000,000 units a quarter – most with FM radio chips inside them. Apple might be big, but Nokia is way bigger. Twenty times bigger, in fact.)

10 comments

CBC Radio 2 (cbcradio2) 's status on Thursday, 10-Sep-09 03:27:24 UTC - Identi.ca
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 4:27am

Peter Cook (petercook) 's status on Thursday, 10-Sep-09 03:32:05 UTC - Identi.ca
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 4:32am

Simon Rushton
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 7:31am

This all sounds wonderful. But aren’t we turning FM off?
In 10 years time will we be able to pause the sound of static? What will happen James?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

RadioAssistant.com - Because We Love Radio
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 7:43am

[...] britiske radioentusiasten og teknologibloggeren James Cridland er også veldig positiv, men belyser de problemene han har sett ved iPod Nano. For det første [...]

Ian Deeley
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 11:58am

Its always struck me as odd that BBC networks on FM still take a different RDS Radiotext feed (often updated show by show to simply inform you of the current programme), when the digital platforms get DLS “Livetext”.

In contrast the DLS “Livetext” is being dynamically updated by production staff throughout the programme, as well as taking the same track playing information that you can find at the incredibly useful http://trackplaying.appspot.com

Perhaps it is a technical constraint of the National RDS encoders, or a USP for DAB?

Perhaps time someone had a rethink over this discrepancy given the inevitable ubiqity this new iPod will gain following Christmas 2009?

(These are my personal views and not those of my employer)

James Cridland
commenting at September 10th, 2009 at 12:01pm

As an update, a real-life video has now been posted showing the radio working, at http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/ipod-nano-5g-with-camera-first-hands-on/

Spike Nesmith
commenting at September 11th, 2009 at 3:38am

@Simon – I doubt those things are made to last any more than 6 or 7 years. I know my ipod crapped out after 4.

“currently available only in the US on radio stations that support iTunes Tagging”

What an odd addition. I mean, hooray for putting in an FM radio with actual functionality and all, and it looks like a great selling point in theory, but unless the radio stations get a cut from sales of the tagged songs, they’re probably not going to bust their bahookies putting in the technology that supports it. Speaking from a US perspective, if you go outside any major city and into a sub-100 market and you’ll see little to no use of RDS, let alone HD or any sort of song tagging. But maybe Apple assume they can make enough sales from the New Yorks and LAs and Chicagos rather than the Schenectadys and the hills and hollers. I wonder, though. Other than maybe a few more listeners, what’s in it for the stations?

They would have been far better embedding that iphone application that can automatically detect what song is playing, than relying on already cash-strapped stations to invest in something new. Particularly in this economy.

I know you yawn at the frequency display, but I’ve seen Arbitron research that suggests more people use frequency to ID a station in a diary than anything else. =)

Trevor Greene
commenting at September 23rd, 2009 at 1:43am

Spike,

If you take the time to search around, you would see that Radio stations that become Affiliates with Apple do recieve commission for songs that are bought that were played on their station and tagged by someone while listening to that station. All you have to do is sign up for the program and make sure your information and metadata are in line with iTunes so they sync. I’m not being rude, I just wish people would simply do a quick Google search before speaking bad about any company, yes I do love Apple products but that in no way influences my opinion. Have a good day, and feel free to check out the PDF from Apple describing this whole process and everything about the Affiliate program!

http://images.apple.com/itunes/tagging/pdf/itunes_tagging.pdf

James Cridland
commenting at September 23rd, 2009 at 7:12am

Trevor – I’m not sure that Spike was quite saying that stations didn’t earn from iTunes tagging.

However, it is not a small piece of work to enable this technology; and for many stations means considerable work on their transmission chain (something that RadioDNS services avoid, incidentally).

Thomas
commenting at January 6th, 2010 at 8:11pm

I think is great the iPod get finally a radio FM, the idea of tagging and then selling it on iTunes is just genius.

Leave a comment

Here's my commenting policy

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.

Additional comments powered by BackType