James Cridland's blog

A radio futurologist writing about what happens when radio and new platforms collide

« | Blog index | »

24 hours with a Google / Samsung Galaxy Nexus

Posted on Tuesday, November 29th, 2011 at 10:07am. #

Galaxy Nexus on a MacBook Air

[UPDATE: want to know the bugs in the Galaxy Nexus?]

Partially driven by a wish to play with the latest technology; partially driven by the high use my phone gets (it’s probably on-par with the amount of time I use my MacBook Air, all things considered); and partially driven by an oncoming trip to Australia where a pentaband phone would be useful, I took the plunge yesterday, and purchased a Galaxy Nexus Android phone – the first with Ice Cream Sandwich, the new Android release. Here, as is customary, are my initial impressions as a mini review.

It’s ma-hoosive
It’s large. Very large. Very large indeed. The phone’s almost wider than my hand. I’m unused to a phone this large, and it took quite a bit of getting used to. Partially, that was the appeal of the phone – a larger, less cramped screen than my original Nexus One; and the extra real-estate is certainly worth it for some of the things it does.

The screen
The screen is… different. While the Nexus One was hardly the worst screen in the world, this is astoundingly sharp and clear. On ‘auto’, it’s less bright than the Nexus One, which is no bad thing. The resolution is pretty incredible – the photograph above gives you some idea of the crispness of the display: the amount of pixels crammed into this screen is pretty impressive. (The iPhone 3 was 163 PPI (320×480), Nexus One was 252 PPI (480×800), the Galaxy Nexus is 316 PPI (720×1280); the iPhone’s retina display slightly beating it for density at 326 PPI, though the much lower resolution of 640×960.) It’s the first time I’ve had a ‘retina’ display of this quality, and it’s an excellent screen.

That said, the screen’s also a little strange. It’s a little like paper – both from the point of view of the colour-balance and the slightly odd effects you sometimes get with the printing process. A slab of grey will be slightly textured, as if it’s printed in WIRED. The contrast of my wallpaper is markedly less on the Galaxy Nexus than it is on the Nexus One (although the resolution and crispness is incredible). Nothing wrong with it – just ‘different’.

Incidentally, I’ve always thought the N1′s screen was too bright, and I don’t quite understand why you can’t alter brightness levels under an “auto” setting anyway. Perhaps it should be renamed “adaptive”: I normally prefer a darker screen than the “auto” setting gives me. Why shouldn’t I be able to change that brightness down a little?

It’s thin and light
At 8.9mm, it’s thinner than the 11.5mm Nexus One (and significantly thinner than the 12.3mm iPhone), the thing that most people have remarked on has been the weight of the phone. It’s light – very light. The Nexus One is 130g, and the significantly larger Galaxy Nexus is just 135g – but feels lighter because of the plastic construction rather than metal. I prefer the feel of metal, to be honest, and don’t much care for the nobbly plastic back of the device; but despite its size (it’s ma-hoosive, did I mention that?) it feels deceptively light. It’s quite a surprise.

Ice Cream Sandwich is nice
Ice Cream Sandwich, the new version of Android, isn’t too much different from earlier versions from a functional point of view, though the contacts app particularly appears to have undergone a significant reworking (and is significantly more integrated with Google+).

But that said, ICS is a significant step forward in terms of look and feel. You sense that the Android team have (finally) got to grips with the slightly clunky feel of the OS, and everything has had a good makeover in terms of prettiness and consistency. The simple design patterns that are now part of the Google experience on the web are also the simple design patterns within this phone.

As someone with an Android Honeycomb tablet, it’s interesting to see much of the refinements of Honeycomb coming to the phone: with some useful additions. I like the way you can simply and straightforwardly stop apps from running, using the new multitasking button along the bottom and then ‘flicking’ the app off the screen. I’m a particular fan of the data usage portion of the settings, replicating almost entirely the functionality of 3G Watchdog and enabling you to know exactly what apps are using what data. Widgets and Gmail have been visually reworked, too, along the lines of the Honeycomb look/feel. It’s a significant change from Android 2.3, and those without Honeycomb will notice the difference very quickly.

Memory
One of the main issues of the Nexus One was its memory management. I have had to do some irritating fiddling to run the amount of apps I’d like to (though CyanogenMod appears to lessen the need for this). The relatively low amount of “internal storage”, the space for apps, was quite an issue for power users.

This problem’s gone with ICS, however. The memory’s one big block (just like Honeycomb), and apps and your media will live side by side to enable enough space to do everything. This is a big tick in my book, and makes this a good upgrade.

The downside to this is that, apparently, the Galaxy Nexus can no longer function as a USB storage device – transferring files to it requires special software for the Mac (though Windows machines appear to cope just fine). It also has no SD card inside it either. Neither is an issue for me: I don’t transfer large files and my music is all on the cloud, using the Google Music application. (Tip: find a US proxy, sign up for Google Music, and you’re done – it works anywhere in the world once you’ve signed up).

No FM radio
Irritating. Since the Samsung Galaxy range all have FM radio receivers, it would appear that someone at Google has decided to deliberately remove this functionality. Is this to get increased takeup with the US carriers, many of whom deliberately remove the FM radio functionality? Whatever – given that 53% of adults who listen to radio on their mobile phone do so via the FM tuner in their phone, it’s a disappointing omission.

Better support for 2-step verification
If you use two-step verification on your Google account, as you should (enable it now, genuinely), then previously you had to make a special password for your Android phone. No longer: during the sign-in process, it correctly recognised that my account had two-step verification, and took me to the web to log in. A little thing, but shows that – at last – different bits in Google appear to be talking to one another.

Nice customer service
Finally, just as an example of the polish Google have put on this product, you even get a nice email on activation, welcoming you to your Galaxy Nexus and taking you through some of the user help. (Not bad, since – as ever – there’s almost no manual in the box at all).

All in all, a very nice, polished, user experience that ought to give the rapidly aging iPhone a run for its money.

(Since the UK’s first with the Galaxy Nexus – anyone got any questions? Happy to answer: just comment below.)

21 comments

Robert Andrews
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 10:13am

Haven’t tried it yet, but I don’t think I like the ICS look; it looks so forcebly Tron-like.
Also, although I thought I wanted stock Android, when I moved from a Galaxy S to Nexus One, I missed the TouchWiz stuff Samsung had done. So I’m currently on an S2, which supports 2-step verification.

Ultimately, all of these phones can be modded to kingdom come anyway, if you’re brave enough. I’m getting there. Got the MIUI ROM on my phone, though not currently active.

“The Galaxy Nexus can no longer function as a USB storage device – transferring files to it requires special software for the Mac.” That sounds pants. So, when you connect and slide down the task bar and click the USB icon, you don’t see a button prompting you to click to mount the phone?

James Cridland
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 10:42am

Robert: the Cyanogen mod is super for that sort of thing (though you can achieve much of the desired effect with a new launcher, like ADW).

When you connect it via USB (I just have!) it says “Connected as a media device: touch for other USB options”. Clicking that gives a menu offering connection as MTP or PTP – with MTP selected.

Flipping the connection over to PTP has opened iPhoto on this MacBook, as I’d expect, though it’s offering me the chance to download “1,434 photos”, most of which are either album covers or image files that iPhoto recognises but can’t actually display. (I always transfer photos using the Flickr app anyway). The MTP protocol isn’t recognised at all by the Mac natively, but is by Windows.

Trevor Long
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 10:51am

James James James, I’m going to play devils advocate here and disagree with you.

FM Radio? Seriously? Three words – “Tune In Radio” – we need to take radio listeners into a new experience, not stuck on ‘bands’ and look at enhanced audio listening to ensure they are with us for the long run.

Tagging is probably the only serious reason for FM, but that can be done with Internet Streaming also.

FM is dead. Radio Has a long and healthy future.

That’s all for now:)
Trevor

Rune Hafskjer
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 11:01am

Hi,

Thanks for a nice overview.

With a screen like that, I expect it to drink battery juice like there’s no tomorrow. Can you give us some insight after a few days of heavy use?

Rune

James Cridland
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 11:20am

Rune – will do.

Trevor – “500 MB data cap” is a pretty good reason why TuneIn Radio might not be your future. Hybrid radio is the future: one that ignores whether a listener is using FM or IP and even flicks between them. I’m not actually asking for an FM tuner app – more the facility for TuneIn Radio to be able to flick between battery-sapping 3G and the free-to-consume FM band without you knowing or even caring. Read this. It’s quite well written. (wink).

Christian Bruelhart
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 1:55pm

With which networks operates the Galaxy Nexus? Okay, Wlan, GSM and UMTS-WDCMA is clear, but does it also works with LTE networks? If you don’t have a lte network at your place, you can still see in the settings and/or manual of the Galaxy Nexus, if it supports LTE or not.
Thank you for your answer!

Chris
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 2:30pm

@James – thanks for the review: very interesting. I wonder whether the FM ‘kit’ is in there, but disabled (as in previous Nexus phones)?

@Trevor – you must be new here…

Terry
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 3:34pm

Thanks for your review James;

I’ve been pondering whether this or the Galaxy S2 is my next phone and your views is rather useful – Given I’m coming from a similar phone background to you [a cyanogen'd desire having got fed up with the operator branded nonsense and lack of updates].

I’ll definitely interested in seeing how you get on with the phone after the initial shiny new toy syndrome has faded! My concerns about the phone are it’s size and whether it’s still comfortable to use after a while of one handed thumb controlled clicking/panning.

On the FM point; I wonder if it’s a design choice due to possible high battery usage?

James Cridland
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 3:35pm

Christian – the Galaxy Nexus is a pentaband device. I think there are two types sold: one for the US market, one for the rest of the world, as is fairly standard. This version doesn’t support LTE – a Google search suggests that the soon-to-be-released US version does.

James Cridland
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 3:37pm

Terry – FM uses considerably less battery than sustained 3G streaming (or even wifi streaming). I’d not think that’s the issue, being honest: I think Tuija is correct when she comments on my Google+ feed that “maybe they just forgot”.

Paul Easton
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 5:12pm

Just out of interest how does it fulfill its primary function – i.e. as a phone? Audio quality? Ease of use?

Tone
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 7:20pm

Trevor makes a valid point. Compared to the literally tens of thousands of choices with 3G streaming radio, FM radio is just plain boring.

Admittedly, streaming radio is still not quite ready for mainstream consumption. Mainly due to the punitive download caps that many telcos place on their smartphones, and battery life is an issue.

Having said all that, should data packs continue to get bigger and battery life continue to improve, online streaming will carve out a sizable niche for itself. However, I guess the lowest common denominator will still plump for the aural sewerage known as commercial FM radio.

Shrey Puranik
commenting at November 29th, 2011 at 9:51pm

I have found this review interesting read – I’ve recently purchased a Samsung Galaxy W, and the FM radio is one of the best things in a modern phone in my opinion. I use TuneIn radio, aswell as some of the more station specific apps, but when on a coach or a train, you’re more likely to get an FM signal than you are mobile Internet – of course that’s not to say that mobile streaming of Internet does not have its place :S

It’s interesting as to why they have disabled the app from the phone though. Until now, I was under the impression that the radio apps on Android were always phone specific, but can you download them from the market?

S

Chris
commenting at November 30th, 2011 at 3:50pm

@Tone “should data packs continue to get bigger”. In the UK at least, they /appear/ to be getting smaller, or at least more costly per Mb of data. Anything less than unlimited is bound to…

H Beast
commenting at December 5th, 2011 at 9:49am

FM radio is a major omission: we have ropey 3G coverage in England – ever been on the HS1 train? No mobile coverage at all over half the line; FM uses less battery than connecting to a streaming service and doesn’t eat into capped data plans.

And as for releasing a media phone with non-upgradable 16Gb memory, and a sub-standard camera.

I was really looking forward to buying this phone until I discovered that it was technologically a step back in many ways.

shelton
commenting at December 9th, 2011 at 2:03pm

I will miss the FM radio tuner; I used it to listen to the (re)broadcast of sound for television at the gym. It’s also nice to listen to local stations without need for a good data connection.

4r4nd0mninj4
commenting at December 12th, 2011 at 10:27pm

I used tune in at work one day and about three hours into my 8hr day my battery was already at 56%. With the data use, battery use, and extra cellular radiation in the mix, wireless radio is just not an option for me. It is a shame that I can’t use my phone to listen to the TV’s at the gym or my local stations that Tune in doesn’t support. I often hike out of cellular reception and have to pack a radio with me for news and weather updates.

Bullit
commenting at December 16th, 2011 at 6:59am

FM radio is a media that will never die. It is like a cockroach after a nuclear war. When there is a major power outage due to a storm or an earthquake, your phone is useless. The only media you are left with of getting any information after a disaster is FM radio. That is why it is imperative phone manufacturers need to include FM radios in their devices if not for entertainment but as an emergency tool.

I will not buy a phone without FM radio.

David
commenting at December 28th, 2011 at 8:59pm

Hi, I just wanted to know will 500mb of internet be enough per month on the nexus ice-cream sandwich phone? Thanks

Dan Akers
commenting at January 8th, 2012 at 11:25am

Completely agree with Bullit. I too will never own a phone without FM: that’s the reason I’ve never had an iPhone and why, now, I won’t get myself a shiny new Nexus, no matter how nice it may otherwise be.

Google and Apple: two tech companies based in the US, where mobile network coverage is, presumably, better than the UK, where we have mobile data caps and massive reception blackspots, even (sometimes especially) in the capital city.

* A short (30 minutes, 10 miles) daily commute to and from Central London, at breakfast and drive, traditionally the best times to listen to radio, where you’ll find the most interesting / compelling / entertaining content.

* FM: I can listen, all the way, with just one short tunnel (and even there the FM signal doesn’t even completely disappear).

* TuneIn Radio: starts off ok, and then we hit a rec..ti.n blac..pot, only 10 miles from the c..tr. of the UK’s capital c..y. Reception blackspots that occur roughly every 2-3 minutes throughout the course of the journey, usually lasting at least a minute or two each. This is unworkable. The only network I’ve tried so far that gives me consistently good reception is Three, reason being this network was built solely on 3G technology unlike the others who are simply sharing legacy tech with upgrades bolted on over the years. Even then, there’s the occasional drop-out, more than FM gives you.

I’ve never understood why mobile manufacturers remove a such basic and universally-loved feature from their handsets. They should visit the UK and commute via a streaming app; that’d change their minds!

FM is always on, albeit occasionally a little fuzzy. Data is either on or off. When I’m listening to a stimulating debate on LBC, a comedy sketch on XFM or being introduced to a great new track I’ve never heard before (3 reasons why radio always beats playlist), I don’t mind a bit of FM fuzz, which is infinitely less annoying than sudden sile… .

Cath
commenting at January 8th, 2012 at 6:16pm

Trevor, Trevor, Trevor ;-)
Living in France and using underground/tube a lot to move around town, there is no way I can use an internet radio…as there is simply no network down there… :-)

Leave a comment

Here's my commenting policy