James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

« A trawl around the web, August 1st to August 31st | Blog index | Welcome, Radio Pop »

The new name for Virgin Radio is absolutely fab

Posted on Monday, September 1st, 2008 at 7:56pm. #

Virgin Radio's new name is...

Virgin Radio’s new name, Absolute Radio, might be seen by some people as a little, um, obvious. Absolute Radio was the name of the company that bid for Virgin Radio in the first place. So, after all the hoopla and suspense over the last few months, is Absolute the right name?

Let’s rewind a little. At the time of writing (8.00pm), there’s no announcement on the Virgin Radio website. There’s nothing on the onegoldensquare staff blog. They’re treating their VIPs as just that - VIPs. So, possibly uniquely in radio… the listeners got to find out before anyone else outside the station did. Above is how I found out. (Well, okay, after a telephone call or two, and a broken embargo on Marketing Week, the rotters). [Later: the announcement is now live on Virgin Radio's site].

So, why do I think the new name is actually really rather special?

It’s got a number of interesting points. Absolute Classic Rock, the classic rock station on DAB and Sky that the company also runs (I can reveal - I think exclusively - that’ll be its new name), is a statement of intent. It plays absolute classic rock. It works on an obvious level.

But what makes the Absolute brand a special one? Surely you can name any old radio station anything you like these days? So why is Absolute a good brand for a multi-platform radio station?

The answer, my friend, is written in the EPG. The electronic programme guide. Radio’s future isn’t 105.8FM. And it’s certainly not 1215AM. The future’s digital. And digital gives us no numbers… just names. My new Pure Evoke Flow, just like almost every DAB Digital Radio built these days, sorts its stations in alphabetical order. In London, the first set of stations on your dial are the BBC stations. From October, no longer - Absolute Radio will be number one. In fact, given that only two stations are “higher” in the alphabet in the UK, and both aren’t on any new platforms, Absolute Radio is guaranteed to be number one on anyone’s radio. Or any internet listing. Or any website.

They’re still committed to DAB - I can possibly also exclusively reveal that they’re concentrating on promoting the in-car element of DAB, giving away around a thousand Pure Highway in-car DAB receivers between now and Christmas. It’s surprising how few people realise that DAB is available in the car as well as in home; this will go a long way towards shattering that misconception. Hopefully, the rest of the radio industry will sing off the same hymn-sheet, just like BBC Radio 5 live has been doing for a while.

And Absolute Radio are also committed to cross-promoting their additional services (available on DAB in London). Oddly, they plan to simulcast the Christian O’Connell breakfast show, and the new drive show with Geoff Lloyd, on all three - and, at the broadcast junctions, heavily promote the choice of listening on each station.

Absolute is unlike other Virgin refugees, who’ve gone with unpronounceable and unspellable names when they jumped away from the Virgin brand. Absolute is easy to spell, easy to remember, and absolutely easy to include in crap puns. And that’s particularly useful for website addresses. Compare, if you will, with GWR plc’s mindnumbing decision to go, five years ago, with “koko.com” as their local radio station website addresses - a worse website address for radio it would have been hard to find, given every mention of it had to be accompanied by how to spell the damn thing.

They’ve done this properly. They own www.absolute.co.uk as well as all the variants. They’ve already thought about additional opportunities. And they’re not shy of the fact… on the ‘questions and answers’ page of the website, they write: “Why are you changing the name?” The old one wasn’t ours, it was lent to us. That means we could not do all the other things we wanted to do, in spinning off the radio station into other areas which we feel you wanted. A beautifully clear way of explaining what I had to in a much quicker way.

Life will be rocky with a brand new name. The station’s web traffic will significantly suffer (and with it, their revenue). Their RAJAR listening figures, based as they are on the antiquated system of writing in a paper diary what you listen to, will undoubtedly dip alarmingly before recovering. Worse, it’s possible that Virgin Enterprises will perform the morally bankrupt exercise of relicensing the name to one of the company’s competitors - though I doubt Virgin Enterprises would be so damn stupid or ignorant.

Absolute’s launch treasure-chest of many millions of pounds does mean they stand a good chance to produce a brand new radio brand: something the station has promised will be “the largest multi-platform marketing campaign in commercial radio history”. And a success for Absolute will be a success for the medium as a whole. So I wish them all the luck.

And to those in the digital media team - your friend is the search and replace function.

15 comments

Rob Lawrence said at September 1st, 2008 at 8:27pm

I’d previously failed to clock the significance of an alphabetically superior brand name (apart from those plumbers in Yellow Pages with names like 00000000011AA Plumbers Ltd!). It’s clearly important.

And what’s so neat — as you identify — is that ‘Absoulte’ works rather well as a ‘definitive’ way of describing the station — much like GMG’s ‘Real’ brand’s been doing these last few years.

And to have the former, without the latter, would probably mean ending up with Aardvark Radio. (Might work for an animation firm, not for a bloke’s radio station!)

The new name for Virgin Radio is Absolute Radio « Paul McNally • Freelance media reporter said at September 1st, 2008 at 8:27pm

[...] More details after midnight. In the meantime, former Virgin Radio digital development director James Cridland explains why the new name is a positive move. [...]

Phil Heywood said at September 1st, 2008 at 8:46pm

Good article, although my old Roberts DAB radio puts numbered stations first, so 2CR takes pride of place there (until, at least, they get rebranded to Heart).

Also, my Vauxhall in-car DAB unit doesn’t put stations in alphabetical order at all. Digital 1 stations go TalkSport, Virgin Radio, Classic FM, Planet Rock, Birdsong.

Apart form that small point, I quite like the new name and am looking forward to hearing the new sound. I hope they keep their promise of broadening the playlist.

Bingethink said at September 2nd, 2008 at 12:20am

[Pedant alert]A Plus comes before Absolute and appears on my DAB radio - it’s a spin-off of Sabras Radio, leicester[/pedant]

Terry Purvis said at September 2nd, 2008 at 6:39am

According to an item on the BBC the owners say they are taking this new set-up “global” - targeting the USA and mainland Europe as well as the UK. So how will they deal with time-zone differences for listeners outside the UK when the live programming is based on UK time?

Russell Chant said at September 2nd, 2008 at 10:46am

Hasn’t the vodka got there first though, in brand recognition terms (albeit without the final e)? Different product/market I know, but hardly a uniquely-owned name.

I’d also think that, personally, I tend to follow “absolute…” with negatives, and “absolutely…” with positives - as you have in your subject header. So is the new name “absolutely fab” or absolute cobblers?

Best of luck to them though, a strong Absolute can only be good for radio.

RossOz said at September 2nd, 2008 at 12:26pm

The loss of the Virgin brand is massive, everyone around the world knows Virgin Radio, you go to a bar in Thailand, Australia or South America and Virgin Radio UK is running… why?.. because everyone knows the Virgin Brand through Virgin Atlantic, Virgin Mobile or Virgin Blue… a sad day for radio around the world.

Tim Abbott said at September 2nd, 2008 at 3:23pm

To answer Terry Purvis’s comment, I’m guessing they mean they are going to use the brand worldwide, not simulcast the UK service. Rather like Virgin Enterprises do at the moment.

James Cridland said at September 3rd, 2008 at 12:00am

You might like to listen to an interview with Clive Dickens at http://www.virginradio.co.uk/about/vip_podcast.html?source=share

What’s interesting is that this is an interview with a Virgin Radio VIP - once more, showing the benefit of getting listeners involved right through the process.

Incidentally, “VIPs” are one of the “ten pillars” of the station - bits they don’t want to change. I’m delighted to hear that; the idea behind ‘VIPs’ was mine (indeed, the name was my idea too).

Phill Clark said at September 3rd, 2008 at 1:10pm

We’re going to rename all our stations ‘Aardvark Radio’ then! Top of the list here we come. ;-)

Llia said at September 3rd, 2008 at 1:29pm

Our VIPs want to be called ASBOs now. :D

Elle said at September 6th, 2008 at 12:41am

James Cridland said “Worse, it’s possible that Virgin Enterprises will perform the morally bankrupt exercise of relicensing the name to one of the company’s competitors - though I doubt Virgin Enterprises would be so damn stupid or ignorant.”

How ignorant of you to think that Virgin would not wish to exploit their own brand, that they should somehow refrain from the UK radio market following TOIs decision not to use the Virgin brand, which reverts back to its owner Virgin Enterprises. It was an absolute crazy idea to buy Virgin Radio without the Virgin brand, a decision that will haunt them for years to come.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article4612053.ece

John McCann, the chief executive of TalkSport-owner UTV, will talk to Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Group about joining forces to bring back the Virgin Radio brand when it disappears later this year.
Mr McCann, who failed to win Virgin Radio in the recent auction for the former SMG assets, said that the TalkSport and Virgin Radio brands would sit particularly well together.
The Virgin Radio assets, which were sold earlier this year without the Virgin brand, are set to be renamed in the next month by new owner Times of India.
“If Virgin Group wants to speak to us about doing something with the Virgin Radio brand, we’d be very interested. It is a strong brand and we would not have bought the Virgin Radio assets without it,” said Mr McCann. He signalled that UTV would be keen to get involved in the expected relaunch.

James Cridland said at September 6th, 2008 at 8:54am

Hello, Elle,

After six years at Virgin Radio, I’d find it difficult to level an accusation at me of being ignorant around this matter. TOI’s decision was, as I’ve written, the correct one.

The article that you quote, which I did link to in my original post, only appears in The Times and in no other newspaper or no other reputable website; the station has always been the subject of intense press speculation.

Virgin could attempt to quickly licence their brand to another radio operator. It would be morally wrong (why shaft people who’ve been a good custodian of the brand for the last 15 years?), and give the new operator exactly the same issues with the brand that TOI have rightly escaped from. It would, in my opinion, be the wrong thing for both parties - VEL and the new licencee - to do.

Culture Vultures said at October 1st, 2008 at 10:36am

Here’s our thoughts on Absolute:
its-all-culture.blogspot.com/2008/09/beginning-of-absolute.html

Radio at the Edge - live blog - blog - James Cridland said at November 10th, 2008 at 10:54am

[...] listener came in and interviewed Clive Dickens. But Absolute also made mistakes. They changed the FM RDS a week early. So Christian [...]

Leave a comment

This website's Gravatar enabled (that's the pictures on the right)

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.