James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

« Fun at Alexandra Palace | Blog index | Don’t ignore free radio research »

The perils of choice on the radio

Posted on Monday, June 23rd, 2008 at 3:41pm. #

38 pages of beer at the Kulminator

“Better creations are superior to more creations”.

In March last year, I posted a comment on Mark Ramsey’s blog. Mark has consistently said that radio listeners don’t want more choice, and used this to relentlessly bash HD Radio, the US’s kind-of-equivalent to DAB Digital Radio here in the UK. I’ve consistently said that choice was the thing that sold DAB Digital Radio over here, and thus there’s proof that radio listeners want additional choice. In short, I always thought Mark was wrong.

I’m beginning to think that Mark was right. In a way, at least.

I am, as regular readers of this blog know, quite a fan of beer. So it was that, a few weeks ago, while on holiday in the Benelux countries, I popped into Antwerp’s famous Kulminator, a beer mecca for Belgian beer afficionados.

Walking around any ordinary Belgian beer shop, I recognise almost every brand on the shelves. I regularly drive into Northern France to buy beer to take back home. I have an endearing irritating habit of photographing beer. A fully paid-up member of CAMRA, I go to beer festivals where I can, and always buy the guest beer in pubs where I can, assuming that they don’t sell my favourite beer on tap; only the Hat and Stick in London does, as far as I can tell.

So, I walked into the Kulminator with excitement, confidently picking up the beer menu.

I flicked through the beer menu.

And panicked.

You see, that’s a photograph of the beer menu above. It’s 38 pages long, of tightly-typed bottled beers. It proudly states that there are 918 different beers in stock. I knew some of them. I didn’t know others of them. I found this choice bewildering; scary, even.

I did what most people would have done in the situation. I went up to the bar. “Um, hello. I quite like darker beers. What would you recommend?” I enquired of the landlady. She recommended a Golden Carolous. I drank it.

In the television world, the amount of channels broadcast on Sky can be bewildering too. Just looking at that list fills you with dread of ever finding anything. Thankfully, Sky have made this easier, with an electronic programme guide which helpfully splits channels up by genre, then by programme.

In both cases, this is choice made much easier - not just one big list, but clearer navigation to something I want, either from a human (in the Kulminator) or from technology (on Sky).

But because screens aren’t the first thing you think of when it comes to a radio, radios are very poor when it comes to navigation. The 50-odd stations I can pick up on my DAB Digital Radio are sorted in nothing other than alphabetical order. The only thing I know about these stations is the name. Now, I know what most of these brands stand for - but I wonder how many people, unpacking their DAB Digital Radio, have the faintest idea what these stations play?

Life clearly gets worse if you’re skipping through XM Radio’s 170 channels - and don’t even get me started on the user interface of a typical internet radio, where a great demonstration is to try tuning into WBUR (which is helpfully near the top of the ‘W’s, after the bottom of the ‘K’s, and therefore if you’re tuning in alphabetically using one tuning knob it’ll take you a number of minutes to find); and what’s “WBUR” as a descriptor of what I could find there?

For radio listeners, there’s no doubt that choice is good, in my mind. But we need better ways of navigating through this choice: otherwise the choice turns into unmanageable bewilderment. Bewilderment only fixable with a stiff drink. Might I recommend a Golden Carolous?

5 comments

Olly said at June 23rd, 2008 at 10:26pm

I’m slightly suprised by this post James ‘cos you miss the fundamental advantage radio has over all those other things you mention. That is, there is no investment in listening to a particular station… you do so until you don’t like it and then press a button and another station appears.

Using your beer analogy, just imagine if you could drink as much or little of a particular type of beer and then when you were bored, or even you fancied a change, you simply pressed a button and another type of beer was in glass. Oh, and all the beer was free.

Is the risk of looking at a beer menu of 300 beers not that there is a huge array of choice, but you will have to part with your cash and invest in one over another (you could ask for a sample, but they’d probably get annoyed after your third or fourth). And it’s deciding which is the best investment for your money that is the problem.

And, how did you know which is your favourite beers? How did you know you even liked dark beers? Probably because you tasted the others and decided you didn’t like them. But then you moved onto a different one until one you liked.

With the Sky EPG analogy (am I the only one who things the EPG is the most badly designed thing ever?) the investment is not that you are spending money but you are spending time. Should you be investing that time when there is the possibility that there is something better on another channel?

Radio’s advantage is that you are rarely investing time to listen to the radio; it’s often simply a by-product of doing something else. So, on my drive to Stevenage tonight… I usually listen to FiveLiveDrive but it was tennis, so I listened to the start of the Eastern-share on 3CR, then got bored and listened to some strange station on 107.8, then I think Heart and then Radio 2 (via Radio 4). Did I lose out because I wasn’t listening to something better on the other side? Possibly, but I don’t think I did because the purpose was not to invest my time listening to the best thing possible, it was to listen to something that accompanied me up the A1.

Eventually I might discover a station that I tend not to get bored of, or I’ll learn about a particular programme that I’ll look out for (on the return journey I was listening to Radcliffe & Maconie), because experience has taught me these are good things I will enjoy.

But even with 1,000,000,000 stations you are likely to go through the same procedure of simply listening, deciding you don’t like it, and moving on.

Links for 2008-06-24 - tonyscott.org.uk said at June 24th, 2008 at 1:58pm

[...] The perils of choice on the radio [James Cridland] [...]

Paul Garrard said at June 25th, 2008 at 10:13am

Apart from the telly DAB is the only way to get the wonderful 6Music.

On the Belgium beer front, might I suggest Tim Webb’s Camra guide to Belgium beers?

Alastair said at June 28th, 2008 at 10:19pm

Tim Webb’s guide seconded…came in handy at the Delirium Cafe in Brussels, which claims to have 2000 beers. Although you can discount a good 500 of them, I reckon, as being fruit novelties (e.g. banana) or from other countries. Why go to Belgium to drink London Pride?

(actually, why go to the end of your road…)

patrick syms said at July 2nd, 2008 at 1:27pm

On the subject of too much choice, you should take a look at Barry Schwartz’s Paradox of Choice. But I think you’re right that the absolute number isn’t necessarily the problem, provided you have a means of making sense of it all.

Leave a comment

This website's Gravatar enabled (that's the pictures on the right)