<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The worst UK media sites for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/</link>
	<description>Radio, broadcasting, websites, and beer. Possibly.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 01:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-04-15 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/#comment-32733</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-04-15 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32733</guid>
		<description>[...] The worst UK media sites for SEO - James Cridland &#8220;Given that most traffic comes from search engines, this roughly equates to the websites where Media UK outperforms a media owner’s own website - by coming high, if not #1, for the media owner’s keywords on Google.&#8221; (tags: internet newspapersites search marketing seo) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The worst UK media sites for SEO - James Cridland &#8220;Given that most traffic comes from search engines, this roughly equates to the websites where Media UK outperforms a media owner’s own website - by coming high, if not #1, for the media owner’s keywords on Google.&#8221; (tags: internet newspapersites search marketing seo) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/#comment-32707</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32707</guid>
		<description>haha! The Derby Evening Telegraph... that doesn't surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha! The Derby Evening Telegraph&#8230; that doesn&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almost witty</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/#comment-32703</link>
		<dc:creator>almost witty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32703</guid>
		<description>Way back during the first dotcom boom, I think mainstream opinion was that optimizing for search engines was a nice thing, but to get your website visitors, you were supposed to splatter your URL everywhere, in your marketing and advertising.

Looks like some organisations still haven't learnt that things move on, and Google is now the gatekeeper to the Net for a lot of people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back during the first dotcom boom, I think mainstream opinion was that optimizing for search engines was a nice thing, but to get your website visitors, you were supposed to splatter your URL everywhere, in your marketing and advertising.</p>
<p>Looks like some organisations still haven&#8217;t learnt that things move on, and Google is now the gatekeeper to the Net for a lot of people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/04/12/the-worst-uk-media-sites-for-seo/#comment-32699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/?p=585#comment-32699</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and your comment about Talk Sport putting UK in the tittle is something I have said for a long time, so many seem to forget a simple fact, which is if people are looking for UK sites they put UK in the search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and your comment about Talk Sport putting UK in the tittle is something I have said for a long time, so many seem to forget a simple fact, which is if people are looking for UK sites they put UK in the search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
