James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

« London Drinker Beer Festival | Blog index | In competition with… »

is writing about Twitter

Posted on Saturday, March 15th, 2008 at 10:07pm. #

As of the time of writing, my Twitter feed has 122 followers. 122 people get my updates. And I must confess to being rather perplexed as to why.

I mean - I try to keep the editorial standards of this blog at least slightly above rock-bottom, but the same certainly doesn’t go for my Twitter feed. Firstly, I phrase my ‘tweets’ slightly oddly so that they also work in Facebook (which I’ve set up to automatically get them); and secondly, because… well. Here’s the last 24 hours or so, and you can make your own mind up…

- is discovering that Google Apps For Your Domain’s start page strips out lots of HTML tags, irritatingly
- is astonished at the poor people-flow designed into Benugo at StPancras. But is enjoying sandwich.
- is amazingly untroubled by a hangover this morning.
- is hungry. Mmm, food.
- is enjoying beerage (Black Sheep Bitter) with a good friend. Would invite you. But I won’t.
- has just discovered that the Midas Touch has shut. Bugger.
- is eating a chilli-con-carne soup (for lunch. Yes. At 4pm) which is officially hotter than the sun.

Yes, this is not the work of an Pulitzer prize-winning journalist. This is, instead, the work of a hurried tapping into an iPhone keyboard or GTalk window. It’s got virtually nothing to do with my day job; indeed, nothing to do with, well, anything much.

So, why do people follow me? I’ve no idea. So I asked, on Twitter, naturally. Here are some of the replies…
- “because you’re a pal”
- “it’s good to keep up with one of the people I most respect in radio tech.. and it’s nice to hear how my pals are doing :)”
- “because I’m nosy, you’re an acknowledged new media guru expert and fellow new/old media colleague of sorts”
- “we shared emails re Media UK then much later met briefly at a podcast conference - Twitter is a useful way to keep in touch.”
…and what’s fascinating about the above is that I’ve not met one of those people, and can count on one hand the amount of times I’ve met the others. While they’re jolly nice people, they’re not what I would call close friends. Not yet.

It’s people who’ve never met me that I find confusing. Why on earth do they add me? I asked one such person this via email. She replied, in part, “I found you after doing a web search for twitter and BBC because I wanted to increase the number of people I was following on twitter so I could better understand what it’s for. That also turned up Jemima Kiss who writes for the Guardian. So, I’m randomly following four complete strangers (all of whom have public blogs though and invite new readers) but it’s good to see how people are using Twitter. I’m sold on the concept, but I agree it might be a bit odd to have strangers following you. I’d like to think it’s not stalking but then again maybe it’s not that clear cut.” (She’s clearly not seen my Friendfeed or my rather more hand-rolled and complete stalkerfeed.)

Of my met-many-times friends, of course, I got sarcastic comments like “it saves actually going to the effort of going to the pub with you”, which just goes to show that clearly NickJ needs to stop spending money on Apple kit, if he can’t afford the beer bill.

But perhaps Ian Fenn has it right. “Somehow these little snippets of others’ lives are reassuring”. I’d agree.

If you’d like to follow me on Twitter, either visit the Twitter website and register from there, or text “FOLLOW JAMESCRIDLAND” to 0762 4801423 (there are other numbers for the US, Canada and India). I just can’t promise that the updates you’ll get from me will be any good. Sorry.

My media website Media UK also provides a set of media news alerts via Twitter.

Photo: Niall Kennedy. Used under licence.

18 comments

Dan Taylor said at March 15th, 2008 at 10:16pm

Spooky - was blogging about twitter at exactly the same time: http://www.fabricoffolly.com/2008/03/it-started-with-tweet-my-twitter.html (well, one minute earlier to be exact)

Tony Moorey said at March 15th, 2008 at 10:44pm

Why do I follow James?

A mix of A (a pal), B (respected former colleague) and C (one day James, you might just be a Scoble!).

More than anything else though, Twitter has made me wish I was at SXSW.

Maybe ‘09.

almost witty said at March 15th, 2008 at 11:26pm

I actually think Twitter updates tend to be much more fascinating than blog entries, precisely because of its shortness and omnipresence. There’s a sense that the world is moving, it’s doing things. It’s the digital equivalent of looking out of your window and staring at your world.

Alan in Belfast said at March 15th, 2008 at 11:40pm

And it helps fill out the background to who you are and what interests you when you post on your work blog!

Annie Mole said at March 15th, 2008 at 11:47pm

Nosiness pure and simple. I have met you in the flesh now and you were not at all how I imagined you would be from just seeing your photos and reading your blog. And the few emails we’ve exchanged over the years. Now that I follow your tweets it makes much more sense. You’re more like your tweets than you are like your photos (if that makes sense).

Memex 1.1 » Blog Archive » Why follow? said at March 16th, 2008 at 10:01am

[...] ‘follow’ him on Twitter. So he asked them (via Twitter) to tell him why — and wrote about the answers. As you’d expect, they’re varied. I saw his tweet too late to respond, but [...]

Llia said at March 16th, 2008 at 8:19pm

It’s interesting that you address this, I’ve found that Twitter is one of the hardest website concepts to explain to non-users. I almost look at it as a very, very cut down blogging tool. Tiny weeny mini-blog updates!

I believe that it links into ideas I looked at behind the reasons that people blog and the reasons people read blogs. (In particular when the subject matter is merely their everyday lives, not for example a blog about a certain subject such as politics.) In my opinion it’s a mixture of narcissism and voyeurism. However, it’s not unhealthy narcissism and voyerism, I think it’s just human nature for people to take an interest in what you’re doing and for you to want them to!

Also, I notice you have a QR code in the top left-hand corner of your site. I noticed it before but I never realised what it was. They’re quite fun!

Richard Sambrook said at March 16th, 2008 at 8:24pm

Reassuring is a good word to use…Twitter is like having a backchannel on life.

Richard Sambrook said at March 16th, 2008 at 8:25pm

And Twitter is a conversation where Facebook or a blog is a noticeboard

Stilgherrian · links for 2008-03-17 said at March 17th, 2008 at 1:24pm

[...] is writing about Twitter | James Cridland This guy asked why his 122 Twitter followers followed him, and there’s some interesting answers. (tags: twitter) [...]

The URL shortening anti pattern « Derivadow.com said at March 20th, 2008 at 1:53pm

[...] tinyurl, URL Along with others I’ve recently started to grok Twitter - it took a while - but I now find it a [...]

Frankie Roberto said at March 24th, 2008 at 4:01pm

I think your trying to make Twitter work on Facebook is a mistake. I went along with that for a while too before I realised. They’re different audiences, and different forms of communication. @-replies and @-references don’t make any sense on Facebook.

James Cridland said at March 24th, 2008 at 4:45pm

Hi, Frankie - @replies don’t make it to Facebook, only general “is” information does. True, if I put a name in the middle of a standard update it’ll make it, but I think my friends are savvy enough to understand what’s going on.

Frankie Roberto said at March 24th, 2008 at 11:24pm

@James interesting, I didn’t know that. I still found them to be different audiences and styles of updates though. Maybe that’s just coz not many of my non-geeky Facebook friends have made it onto Twitter yet though.

MB said at April 10th, 2008 at 2:07am

Heh. Thanks for writing this; I have 160-odd twitter followers — people I’ve never heard of — and I couldn’t figure out why (I’m a small-potatoes blogger). Nor could I figure out why (or how) someone would follow thousands of people, as many of my Twitter followers do.

So I googled my question and landed here. Thanks for the insight!

Dave Cridland said at April 16th, 2008 at 3:51pm

The thing I find weird is that I’ve no interest whatsoever in following James’s Twitter feed, and I’m his brother. Surely, it cannot possibly be more interesting for anyone else?

The wisdom of the (Twitter) crowd - blog - James Cridland said at April 17th, 2008 at 7:55pm

[...] my brother, the famous XMPP and IMAP specialist Dave Cridland said recently, “I’ve no interest whatsoever in following James’s Twitter feed, and I’m his brother. [...]

Jack (twitter marketing) Sinclair said at April 18th, 2008 at 9:21pm

Hey James,

It really depends on who is following you - if the people following you are responding to questions, that is awesome!

Some follow for no reason at all, and do not even login to twitter, or use any of the tools to keep connected - these folks just login once in a blue moon and twitter something, and if this describes your followers, then don’t sweat it.

Adding value is always key when you are twittering if you are using it for business or relationships.

Leave a comment

This website's Gravatar enabled (that's the pictures on the right)