James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

« Best. Letter. Ever. | Blog index | Derek Wyatt MP. Learn from this man. »

How to deal with legal threats for forum owners

Posted on Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 at 9:50pm. #

So, I’ve run (for a long time) a media discussion board. Occasionally I have the odd complaint in vaguely threatening legal terms: along the lines of “Someone’s saying stuff about me that I don’t like. How dare you let anonymous people post nasty stuff about me. I want you to remove this, right now, otherwise I’ll tell my solicitors to take further action.” (In fact, Media UK doesn’t accept anonymous discussion users; but I’m fleshing this out to help this blog posting).

So - how would you deal with it? If you asked my advice, I’d tell you the following:

For media discussion boards at least, it’s not generally held to be libellous to say that someone’s rubbish at being a TV presenter. Theatre critics and reviewers are generally said not to libel an actor by critiquing his work (though there are some exceptions to this). Further, by removing stuff just because that presenter doesn’t like it is dangerous. You might be tacitly agreeing with him that you’ve published libel.

So, first, reply confidently to point out that criticism is not libel. Ask the complainant to tell you what page they’re complaining about (they’ll need to be specific, and it’ll help you). Go through the posts and remove any that are a bit iffy. “He sounds shit” is not normally libellous. “He’s a twat to work with” however probably is. (If you do remove any, reply by saying that in your opinion nothing was libellous, however you’ve removed some posts that you felt didn’t come up to the normal standard of debate. Thank him for drawing it to your attention. Never admit to libel. Oooh, no.)

Make it clear that you do not moderate posts before publication: important because this, in many cases, can lessen your legal risk. Similarly, offer the complainant a right of reply.

Never reveal user details without a court order, naturally. But, mail the user who’s slagged this guy off, make it clear that you’ve had a serious legal complaint made about his post, reassure him that his identity is safe and that you’re fighting on his behalf. This will stop further posts and make a friend - and possibly that user will request his emails are deleted anyway, in which case you can let the complainant know.

All the above should result in any potential legal worry going away. It’s worked for me. But remember - I am not a lawyer. Seek help if it’s looking nasty.

And here endeth the lesson. Rubbish jokes and postings about beer will follow shortly. This posting was brought to you thanks to a small bottle of Leffe Tripel, the only type of Leffe that’s bottle-conditioned.

Photo: Brooke Novak. Used under licence.

4 comments

Alistair MacDonald said at January 31st, 2008 at 1:21pm

As a non lawyer that seems really good advice. The only point I would make is that, when it comes to liable, be careful about supporting a possible liable defendant as you may become liable yourself, apparently. I guess supporting that person in keeping there private details private would be okay, but I am not a lawyer.

Ben Perreau said at January 31st, 2008 at 4:25pm

Yep, worked on a couple of websites like that.

This bit is important in my (again not a solicitor of any kind) experience:

“Make it clear that you do not moderate posts before publication: important because this, in many cases, can lessen your legal risk. Similarly, offer the complainant a right of reply.”

It’s about ’safe-harbour’ policy. If you aren’t pre-moderating or ‘controlling’ the environment, your liability is significantly reduced, I’m told. And surely that’s the point, thankfully.

Yasmin on internet Libel & Defamation research said at May 8th, 2008 at 10:14am

How to remove Internet based defamation and online libel
I am currently researching the evolution of internet based defamation and online libel and its financial, emotional and commercial impact. I am also studying the world’s legal systems attempts to keep up with the internet explosion as it pertains to freedom of speech.
I will appreciate if lawyers, free speech enthusiasts and technology people who have valid comments contact me with their thoughts. Also, please send me links to any good reference material that you know of.
Based on my research, “winners” in court are far and few between. But online slander, libel & defamation is obviously a significant problem. These guys make a living out of getting online libel removed with out-of-court solutions, but they also assist attorneys in investigations: www.rexxfield.com . They do pro bono for victims that can’t get work due to libel. (Also supporting my research)
Seeking case studies:
• Please help me if you know of real life examples of the following:
• Suicides or attempted suicide due to online libel or internet defamation
• Bankruptcy due to online defamation or internet based libel
• Divorce due to online libel or internet defamation
• Termination of employment due to online defamation or web based libel
• Physical assaults due to online libel or internet defamation
• Successful litigation against online libel or internet defamation activities
If there is someone else undertaking a similar study wishing to collaborate, I’d love to hear from you. The internet is a big place, there is much to sift through.
Thank you very much,
Yasmin
yaaawnn [at] gmail [d0t] com (that is G M A I L in case it doesn’t appear )
Keyw0rds only:
• Internet libel
• Online libel
• Web based libel
• Internet defamation
• Online defamation
• Web based defamation
• Internet slander
• Online slander
• Web based slander

Forums, Blogs, and Internet Libel « Emily First Girl: ………….DID ……….Multiplicity said at August 13th, 2008 at 6:00pm

[...] (http://james.cridland.net/blog/2008/01/30/how-to-deal-with-legal-threats-for-forum-owners/) [...]

Leave a comment

This website's Gravatar enabled (that's the pictures on the right)

To prove you're human, type the two words below into the box provided.