<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How successful is DAB Digital Radio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/</link>
	<description>Radio, broadcasting, websites, and beer. Possibly.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: text/plain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Email: &#8220;I&#8217;m not dead yet!&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-27690</link>
		<dc:creator>text/plain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Email: &#8220;I&#8217;m not dead yet!&#8221;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-27690</guid>
		<description>[...] face of new technology. DAB Radios turn out to be twice as popular as iPods, according to something James found, and I think email will increase, not decrease, in popularity as new technology comes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] face of new technology. DAB Radios turn out to be twice as popular as iPods, according to something James found, and I think email will increase, not decrease, in popularity as new technology comes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-17953</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-17953</guid>
		<description>iPod has sold 110 million worldwide.  I reckon my next DAB will be a Roberts Robi.  I never understood the fear of iPod from radio people, they are two different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod has sold 110 million worldwide.  I reckon my next DAB will be a Roberts Robi.  I never understood the fear of iPod from radio people, they are two different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Childs</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14621</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14621</guid>
		<description>Interesting statistic - likely hasn't been discussed because DAB radio is an extension of an existing product category while iPod was the first break out product from an entirely new category. And people like to talk about the break outs. 

It would also be interesting to compare the DAB numbers to the US HD radio numbers. DAB has a lot cleaner marketing story – it’s a clean break from AM/FM with a strong technology roadmap. 

What’s a pity is that while Canada spent a lot researching DAB – and continues to have programs looking at enhancing mobility and multimedia – the industry looks to be going HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting statistic - likely hasn&#8217;t been discussed because DAB radio is an extension of an existing product category while iPod was the first break out product from an entirely new category. And people like to talk about the break outs. </p>
<p>It would also be interesting to compare the DAB numbers to the US HD radio numbers. DAB has a lot cleaner marketing story – it’s a clean break from AM/FM with a strong technology roadmap. </p>
<p>What’s a pity is that while Canada spent a lot researching DAB – and continues to have programs looking at enhancing mobility and multimedia – the industry looks to be going HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William T</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator>William T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14584</guid>
		<description>@Christopher: of course, it would be a lot better for both of them if you could buy an Ipod with a built in DAB radio...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christopher: of course, it would be a lot better for both of them if you could buy an Ipod with a built in DAB radio&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Elkins</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14578</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Elkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14578</guid>
		<description>Yikes - proof that stats can throw up surprises. Whether it's good for DAB or bad for the iPod is where the question now lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes - proof that stats can throw up surprises. Whether it&#8217;s good for DAB or bad for the iPod is where the question now lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Buckingham</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Buckingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/09/22/how-successful-is-dab-digital-radio/#comment-14576</guid>
		<description>That is a surprisingly impressive statistic. I can only assume that because there is no single supplier/single product DAB radio that it doesn't share the same kind of awareness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a surprisingly impressive statistic. I can only assume that because there is no single supplier/single product DAB radio that it doesn&#8217;t share the same kind of awareness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
