<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD Radio&#8217;s UK parallels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/</link>
	<description>Radio, broadcasting, websites, and beer. Possibly.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14178</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14178</guid>
		<description>I've mailed 'RF Engineer' directly with the following points:

1. The picture is from Flickr - click on it - and is tagged 'ibiquity' and 'hdradio'. It is sourced from http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceonyc/71540828/
2. The picture, just like any picture I add to the blog, is there to brighten the page (and not to make any specific point).
3. Whether it's HD, DRM or DAB, it's immaterial to the point which I'm making about cross-promotion - which is a factor in why digital-only stations aren't producing extra sales. This isn't a technology argument.
4. WHERE do I imply or say anything about Digital Radio Mondiale? Or do you mean Digital Rights Management?

Much confusion.

Ordinarily, I don't engage people within my comments; much less those not prepared to back up their argument with their real name. But this comment highlights, neatly, the preoccupation many have about technology and not content. The public doesn't give a stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve mailed &#8216;RF Engineer&#8217; directly with the following points:</p>
<p>1. The picture is from Flickr - click on it - and is tagged &#8216;ibiquity&#8217; and &#8216;hdradio&#8217;. It is sourced from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceonyc/71540828/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceonyc/71540828/</a><br />
2. The picture, just like any picture I add to the blog, is there to brighten the page (and not to make any specific point).<br />
3. Whether it&#8217;s HD, DRM or DAB, it&#8217;s immaterial to the point which I&#8217;m making about cross-promotion - which is a factor in why digital-only stations aren&#8217;t producing extra sales. This isn&#8217;t a technology argument.<br />
4. WHERE do I imply or say anything about Digital Radio Mondiale? Or do you mean Digital Rights Management?</p>
<p>Much confusion.</p>
<p>Ordinarily, I don&#8217;t engage people within my comments; much less those not prepared to back up their argument with their real name. But this comment highlights, neatly, the preoccupation many have about technology and not content. The public doesn&#8217;t give a stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RF Engineer</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14177</link>
		<dc:creator>RF Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14177</guid>
		<description>Is the radio pictured and labeled here truly an HD radio?
Or is it a DRM radio?
The term "HD RADIO" is a proprietary trademark of iBiquity, and has nothing whatever to do with DRM radio (an entirely different system).
Here is the website:
http://www.ibiquity.com/corporate/trademarks
I beleive Mark Ramsey said nothing about DRM radio, as you imply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the radio pictured and labeled here truly an HD radio?<br />
Or is it a DRM radio?<br />
The term &#8220;HD RADIO&#8221; is a proprietary trademark of iBiquity, and has nothing whatever to do with DRM radio (an entirely different system).<br />
Here is the website:<br />
<a href="http://www.ibiquity.com/corporate/trademarks">http://www.ibiquity.com/corporate/trademarks</a><br />
I beleive Mark Ramsey said nothing about DRM radio, as you imply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Easton</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14175</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14175</guid>
		<description>If you want an example, London's Heart 106.2 ran an on-air cross-promotional campaign for LBC 97.3 earlier this year.  As for people buying DAB receivers to listen to Planet Rock, have you seen the Pure Evoke 1-XT Marshall special-edition?  It is designed to look like a Marshall amp, has the Planet Rock logo on the front and - paying homage to Spinal Tap - the volume control goes up to 11.

http://www.pure.com/Releases/Release.asp?ID=270

While there's a strong argument in favour of shuffling listeners between your various brands - after all, if they're switching between Capital FM, Planet Rock and XFM they're still listening to a GCap-owned station - I agree with Steve Martin that, as far as commercial radio is concerned, there is likely to be more mileage in cross-promoting specific programmes and events rather than simply pointing people in the way of another.  When Capital Gold used to do football, presenters on Capital FM would cross-promote the match coverage but would never suggest to listeners that if they wanted to hear more classic hits they should tune to 1548AM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want an example, London&#8217;s Heart 106.2 ran an on-air cross-promotional campaign for LBC 97.3 earlier this year.  As for people buying DAB receivers to listen to Planet Rock, have you seen the Pure Evoke 1-XT Marshall special-edition?  It is designed to look like a Marshall amp, has the Planet Rock logo on the front and - paying homage to Spinal Tap - the volume control goes up to 11.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pure.com/Releases/Release.asp?ID=270">http://www.pure.com/Releases/Release.asp?ID=270</a></p>
<p>While there&#8217;s a strong argument in favour of shuffling listeners between your various brands - after all, if they&#8217;re switching between Capital FM, Planet Rock and XFM they&#8217;re still listening to a GCap-owned station - I agree with Steve Martin that, as far as commercial radio is concerned, there is likely to be more mileage in cross-promoting specific programmes and events rather than simply pointing people in the way of another.  When Capital Gold used to do football, presenters on Capital FM would cross-promote the match coverage but would never suggest to listeners that if they wanted to hear more classic hits they should tune to 1548AM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve martin</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>steve martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>I used to run the bit of the BBC that managed the radio cross-promotion between different services - my experience was that the most effective and successful cross-promos were for specific appointments to listen rather than generic brand promotion.

That's great when you're the BBC and making lots of great individual programmes on fairly broad genre networks. Commercial radio does less of this of course. Its stations are largely built around consistent streams of music programming designed by mood or format.

Of course the BBC has put energy into getting cross promotion right for good reason - it's publicly funded and therefore has a continuing public service obligation to inform its audiences of the full range of services they've paid for. It also has to deliver that information in the most cost-effective manner which invariably means using strong creative on its own airwaves.

Like you James, I've been trying to recall examples of commercial radio cross promotion. Sadly my mind is as blank as the pages in Mark Ramsey's passport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to run the bit of the BBC that managed the radio cross-promotion between different services - my experience was that the most effective and successful cross-promos were for specific appointments to listen rather than generic brand promotion.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s great when you&#8217;re the BBC and making lots of great individual programmes on fairly broad genre networks. Commercial radio does less of this of course. Its stations are largely built around consistent streams of music programming designed by mood or format.</p>
<p>Of course the BBC has put energy into getting cross promotion right for good reason - it&#8217;s publicly funded and therefore has a continuing public service obligation to inform its audiences of the full range of services they&#8217;ve paid for. It also has to deliver that information in the most cost-effective manner which invariably means using strong creative on its own airwaves.</p>
<p>Like you James, I&#8217;ve been trying to recall examples of commercial radio cross promotion. Sadly my mind is as blank as the pages in Mark Ramsey&#8217;s passport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cridland</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cridland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>So, nobody who listens to LBC is interested in classic rock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, nobody who listens to LBC is interested in classic rock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14172</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/07/13/hd-radios-uk-parallels/#comment-14172</guid>
		<description>Aren't the commercial station's DAB stations different genres to their AM/FM station?   With Five Live there is reasonable crossover in formats between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the commercial station&#8217;s DAB stations different genres to their AM/FM station?   With Five Live there is reasonable crossover in formats between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
