<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How big is your staff list?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/</link>
	<description>Radio, broadcasting, websites, and beer. Possibly.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jackson</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/comment-page-1/#comment-9099</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/#comment-9099</guid>
		<description>There's a particularly American approach to publishing that seems relevant here. I remember once reading an article about a small-circulation art magazine in the US, run on a shoestring, that had just unearthed some Andrew Wyeth originals. One line in the US report read: "The magazine, on a barebones editorial staff of 28..." At the time, I was running two magazines with a total editorial staff of five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a particularly American approach to publishing that seems relevant here. I remember once reading an article about a small-circulation art magazine in the US, run on a shoestring, that had just unearthed some Andrew Wyeth originals. One line in the US report read: &#8220;The magazine, on a barebones editorial staff of 28&#8230;&#8221; At the time, I was running two magazines with a total editorial staff of five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Freeman</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/comment-page-1/#comment-8809</link>
		<dc:creator>R Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/#comment-8809</guid>
		<description>When I started in radio, in New Zealand, the newsroom had a staff of two, and only one dumb terminal between them.

Yes, 870 does seem massive, but I don't think they all work on the LA Times publication.  I've heard some very interesting statistics about UK newspaper staffing.  One large paper towards the north of the country has over a 100 editorial people, but can't any of them to train in new multimedia production methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started in radio, in New Zealand, the newsroom had a staff of two, and only one dumb terminal between them.</p>
<p>Yes, 870 does seem massive, but I don&#8217;t think they all work on the LA Times publication.  I&#8217;ve heard some very interesting statistics about UK newspaper staffing.  One large paper towards the north of the country has over a 100 editorial people, but can&#8217;t any of them to train in new multimedia production methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safran</title>
		<link>http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/comment-page-1/#comment-8656</link>
		<dc:creator>Safran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.cridland.net/blog/2007/04/23/how-big-is-your-staff-list/#comment-8656</guid>
		<description>Right? What would you do with 900 editorial people? You'd start with 1,800 niche blogs for one. Can you imagine a business model today where you went to someone and said "I've got this great idea - we employ about a thousand people to put out a single form of news, which will be instantly obsolete and we'll look down on anyone that suggests there is a more efficient way to do what we do!"

It's all nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right? What would you do with 900 editorial people? You&#8217;d start with 1,800 niche blogs for one. Can you imagine a business model today where you went to someone and said &#8220;I&#8217;ve got this great idea - we employ about a thousand people to put out a single form of news, which will be instantly obsolete and we&#8217;ll look down on anyone that suggests there is a more efficient way to do what we do!&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
