James.Cridland.net

James Cridland's blog

Where radio and new platforms collide. With beer.

« Clever mog | Blog index | How not to take advantage of a naming similarity »

Getting rid of ‘out of office’ replies in Gmail

Posted on Friday, April 6th, 2007 at 9:18pm. #

One of my websites, Media UK, sends quite a quantity of email out every day: over eight thousand emails, I’d estimate - things like topic notifications, as well as media news and jobs. It sends these emails from an admin email address.

Normally, you’d set up an address for this which automatically (and silently) deletes all incoming email. Most people use “donotreply@” or “no_reply@” as an email address of this type. When I set the site up to send automated email, in 1999, this wasn’t as standard - and, in any case, I’ve found that I get an interesting amount of people replying to these automated messages. Yesterday for example I got a nice reply (to a clearly automated mail) wishing the webserver a happy easter; at other times they’re genuine customer queries which I respond to. The only drawback I have with this plan is the amount of ‘out of office’ replies I get.

I rarely set ‘out of office’ replies. They’re named wrong, for a start. Just because I am ‘out of the office’, I’m not unable to read emails, nor to deal with them in an efficient way. (Indeed, if I’m out of the office, I’m more likely to be able to deal with email in many cases.) They ought to be named “vacation responder” or something. It is genuinely useful to know when someone’s away for two weeks. It’s not useful to know if someone’s away for the next hour.

Further, out of office replies are horrid things because they confirm email addresses to spammers (or, worse, mailbomb an innocent person’s email account) - and they are made all the more horrid because there is no standard for them, so it’s quite difficult to spot them. If we -must- send these to each other, why does every single email program send them differently? Why isn’t there an RFC for this?

So here’s my way of removing them. This is the result of nearly two yeas of experience with out-of-office messages, and it seems to work. So far.

Using Gmail (the eventual destination of my emails), you need to set two filters: one checking the subject, and one checking the body of the mail. I use ’skip inbox and delete it’; you might just want to apply a label. Naturally, this works with Outlook too.

Check the subject for…

“(Away)” OR “out of office” OR “Automated Reply Re:” OR “out of the office” OR “ikke til stede” OR “Yahoo! Auto Response” OR “Automatic Reply”

Check the body for…

“I am away on leave” OR “or wait for me to respond.” OR “I’m now working off-site until” OR “Thanks for emailing me - I will try and reply to your email promptly.” OR “I am unable to respond to your email until ” OR “I’m now out of the office” OR “I am away at the moment” OR “I am out the office until” OR “I am out of the office” OR “I am currently out of the office” OR “I’m now on leave” OR “I am now on holiday” OR “away from her desk until” OR “away from his desk until” OR “out of the office all day today”

Users of Gmail can just type these in: if you’ve not realised, I discovered, though trial and error, that “OR” works just fine with Gmail filters. (Or, if you’re in the UK, Google Mail filters, not that I’m typing that for the extra Technorati links or anything).

Have I missed any? Are you a member of the anti-out-of-office club too? Let me know in the comments.

4 comments

James Cridland said at April 6th, 2007 at 9:27pm

Of course, as soon as I type this, I realise there is an RFC - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3834.html - but that it doesn’t specify how to make an auto-responder message like this obvious.

There “should” be a field marked “Auto-Submitted: auto-replied” in the header. Both Microsoft Exchange (looking at a BBC bounce) and Novell Groupwise (looking at a Chrysalis Radio bounce) do not set this header field.

Steve Robertson said at April 7th, 2007 at 3:45am

Out of office replies can, in certain circumstances, be that cause of mail-loops. It only takes two individual email addresses setting-up an out of ofice reply at the same time to result in a game of e-mail tennis. This could quite easily slow-down a mail server.

I have worked with people who set-up an out of office reply just after sending their last few emails before a couple of weeks in the sun. ISPs have been known to barr ip addresses with unusual amounts of traffic caused by an erroneous out of office reply.

James Masterton said at April 7th, 2007 at 11:22am

HatethemHatethemHatethemHatethemHatethemHatethemHatethem.

Did I mention that I loathe the whole concept of an out of office reply? People in the company I used to do IT for were obsessed with the damn things, to the point of ludicrousness.

Examples include:

- Someone phoning up from the South Of France five days into their holiday to say that they had forgotten to set one and could I do it and arrange for all the people who had mailed them since they went away to be sent one anyway.
- People phoning me to say that they had noticed that their colleague had gone away without setting one and so could this be set urgently - this in a department who routinely shared their login details with each other and checked each others email when they were not around.
- People who would set one and then SEND THEMSELVES A MAIL to check it worked, triggering a mass loop that would mean we’d spend Sunday morning trying to avoid the server dying.
- People who would panic when their second mail of the day to an address failed to get an autoreply. On being told that the software now made sure it only sent one notification per address they viewed it as a disaster.
- People setting a reply when they left their desks TO GO TO LUNCH or when they left for the afternoon after working the early shift.
- People asking if there was a way they could set one for their home email and thinking it strange when I asked them why they wanted to advertise to any random emailer that they were out of the country and leaving their home unattended.

Nothing shows you the size of someone’s ego better than their obsessions with automatically generated emails. Better yet are the ones that say “if your query is urgent then please telephone…”. If it was that urgent surely I would have telephoned in the first place rather than waiting to be told this was the best way to get a response…

An idea for better email unsubscribing - blog - James Cridland said at February 14th, 2008 at 11:40pm

[...] like out of office replies are broken, so it would seem that list subscription similarly is. How can we change the world for the [...]

Leave a comment

This website's Gravatar enabled (that's the pictures on the right)